Social desirability effects on computerized and paper-and-pencil questionnaires

被引:136
作者
Booth-Kewley, Stephanie
Larson, Gerald E.
Miyoshi, Dina K.
机构
[1] USN, Hlth Res Ctr, Behav Sci & Epidemiol Dept, San Diego, CA 92186 USA
[2] San Diego Mesa Coll, Dept Psychol, San Diego, CA 92111 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/j.chb.2004.10.020
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The objectives of the present study were to determine the impact of computer administration of questionnaires on impression management (IM) and self-deceptive enhancement (SDE) and on the disclosure of sensitive information such as alcohol use and risky sex. College students (N = 301) completed several questionnaires in either a computer-administered or paper-and-pencil condition. Respondents who completed the survey on the computer scored significantly higher on SDE than those completing the survey on paper. No differences were found for IM. Respondents in the computer condition also reported a higher level of alcohol consumption and riskier sexual behaviors than those in the paper-and-pencil condition. It is possible that computer administration of surveys creates a social situation that produces a sense of disinhibition in respondents, and this sense of disinhibition may lead to greater reports of risky behaviors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:463 / 477
页数:15
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], J PERSONALITY
[2]   One-year follow-up evaluation of the sexually transmitted diseases/human immunodeficiency virus intervention program in a marine corps sample [J].
Booth-Kewley, S ;
Andrews, AM ;
Shaffer, RA ;
Gilman, PA ;
Minagawa, RY ;
Brodine, SK .
MILITARY MEDICINE, 2001, 166 (11) :987-995
[3]   IMPRESSION MANAGEMENT, SOCIAL DESIRABILITY, AND COMPUTER ADMINISTRATION OF ATTITUDE QUESTIONNAIRES - DOES THE COMPUTER MAKE A DIFFERENCE [J].
BOOTHKEWLEY, S ;
EDWARDS, JE ;
ROSENFELD, P .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 77 (04) :562-566
[4]   Effects of interviewer gender, interviewer choice, and item wording on responses to questions concerning sexual behavior [J].
Catania, JA ;
Binson, D ;
Canchola, J ;
Pollack, LM ;
Hauck, W ;
Coates, TJ .
PUBLIC OPINION QUARTERLY, 1996, 60 (03) :345-375
[5]   Is there a method to our madness? The impact of data collection methodology on organizational survey results [J].
Church, AH .
PERSONNEL PSYCHOLOGY, 2001, 54 (04) :937-969
[6]   AUTOMATED PSYCHOLOGICAL-TESTING - METHOD OF ADMINISTRATION, NEED FOR APPROVAL, AND MEASURES OF ANXIETY [J].
DAVIS, C ;
COWLES, M .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 1989, 49 (02) :311-320
[7]  
Dubrovsk V. J., 1991, Human-Computer Interaction, V6, P119, DOI 10.1207/s15327051hci0602_2
[8]   A quantitative review of the effect of computerized testing on the measurement of social desirability [J].
Dwight, SA ;
Feigelson, ME .
EDUCATIONAL AND PSYCHOLOGICAL MEASUREMENT, 2000, 60 (03) :340-360
[10]   THE RELIABILITY OF A COMPUTER INTERVIEW FOR DRUG-USE ABUSE INFORMATION [J].
ERDMAN, H ;
KLEIN, MH ;
GREIST, JH .
BEHAVIOR RESEARCH METHODS & INSTRUMENTATION, 1983, 15 (01) :66-68