Coupled IMPACT aerosol and NCAR CAM3 model: Evaluation of predicted aerosol number and size distribution

被引:48
作者
Wang, Minghuai [1 ]
Penner, Joyce E. [1 ]
Liu, Xiaohong [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Michigan, Dept Atmospher Ocean & Space Sci, Ann Arbor, MI 48109 USA
[2] Pacific NW Natl Lab, Richland, WA 99352 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
CLOUD CONDENSATION NUCLEI; ATMOSPHERIC SULFURIC-ACID; PARTICLE FORMATION EVENTS; MARINE BOUNDARY-LAYER; SEA-SALT SULFATE; OFF-LINE MODEL; BLACK CARBON; VERSION-3; CAM3; CLIMATE MODEL; MICROPHYSICS MODEL;
D O I
10.1029/2008JD010459
中图分类号
P4 [大气科学(气象学)];
学科分类号
0706 ; 070601 ;
摘要
Simulated aerosol fields from a coupled aerosol/atmospheric circulation model that includes prediction of both sulfate aerosol size and number are evaluated. Sensitivity tests are used to evaluate uncertainties due to the inclusion of primary emitted particulate sulfate as a means of representing nucleation of particles in subgrid-scale plumes, the use of two boundary layer aerosol nucleation mechanisms, and a three-mode sulfate aerosol representation. Simulated annual and global aerosol budgets are comparable to other model studies with the exception of carbonaceous aerosols and fine mode dust, where smaller mass concentrations are simulated. The model underestimates the accumulation mode aerosol number in the marine boundary layer over middle and low latitudes, which is consistent with an underestimate of fine mode sea salt mass in these locations. Primary emitted particulate sulfate contributes significantly to aerosol number at sites located in the boundary layer over Europe, but the absence of constraints on the number of such particles from either observations or fine-resolution models makes this treatment undesirable. Boundary layer nucleation mechanisms improve the comparison of simulated aerosol number concentrations with observations in the marine boundary layer, suggesting that a treatment of boundary layer nucleation is needed in global aerosol models, although more studies are needed to quantify how different nucleation mechanisms and condensable gases other than sulfuric acid affect aerosol number. The three-mode representation of sulfate aerosol simulates the observed increase in accumulation mode number concentration with altitude in the upper troposphere and improves the simulated Aitken mode aerosol number concentration there. This indicates the importance of a separate representation of freshly nucleated particles when nucleation is an important source of particle number concentrations.
引用
收藏
页数:30
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]   The impact of humidity above stratiform clouds on indirect aerosol climate forcing [J].
Ackerman, AS ;
Kirkpatrick, MP ;
Stevens, DE ;
Toon, OB .
NATURE, 2004, 432 (7020) :1014-1017
[2]   Disproportionate impact of particulate emissions on global cloud condensation nuclei concentrations [J].
Adams, PJ ;
Seinfeld, JH .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2003, 30 (05)
[3]   Predicting global aerosol size distributions in general circulation models [J].
Adams, PJ ;
Seinfeld, JH .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 2002, 107 (D19) :AAC4-1
[4]   AEROSOLS, CLOUD MICROPHYSICS, AND FRACTIONAL CLOUDINESS [J].
ALBRECHT, BA .
SCIENCE, 1989, 245 (4923) :1227-1230
[5]   Size and composition measurements of background aerosol and new particle growth in a Finnish forest during QUEST 2 using an Aerodyne Aerosol Mass Spectrometer [J].
Allan, JD ;
Alfarra, MR ;
Bower, KN ;
Coe, H ;
Jayne, JT ;
Worsnop, DR ;
Aalto, PP ;
Kulmala, M ;
Hyötyläinen, T ;
Cavalli, F ;
Laaksonen, A .
ATMOSPHERIC CHEMISTRY AND PHYSICS, 2006, 6 :315-327
[6]   Smoking rain clouds over the Amazon [J].
Andreae, MO ;
Rosenfeld, D ;
Artaxo, P ;
Costa, AA ;
Frank, GP ;
Longo, KM ;
Silva-Dias, MAF .
SCIENCE, 2004, 303 (5662) :1337-1342
[7]   Non-sea-salt sulfate, methanesulfonate, and nitrate aerosol concentrations and size distributions at Cape Grim, Tasmania [J].
Andreae, MO ;
Elbert, W ;
Cai, Y ;
Andreae, TW ;
Gras, J .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1999, 104 (D17) :21695-21706
[8]   A time-averaged inventory of subaerial volcanic sulfur emissions [J].
Andres, RJ ;
Kasgnoc, AD .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1998, 103 (D19) :25251-25261
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2000, 3 COL STAT U COOP I
[10]   Top-down estimates of global CO sources using MOPITT measurements [J].
Arellano, AF ;
Kasibhatla, PS ;
Giglio, L ;
van der Werf, GR ;
Randerson, JT .
GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH LETTERS, 2004, 31 (01) :L011041-5