The impact of municipal solid waste treatment methods on greenhouse gas emissions in Lahore, Pakistan

被引:58
作者
Batool, Syeda Adila [1 ]
Chuadhry, Muhammad Nawaz [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Punjab, Dept Space Sci, Lahore 54600, Pakistan
[2] Univ Punjab, Coll Earth & Environm Sci, Lahore 54600, Pakistan
关键词
ANAEROBIC-DIGESTION; MANAGEMENT; STRATEGIES; CITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.wasman.2008.01.013
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The contribution of existing municipal solid waste management to emission of greenhouse gases and file alternative scenarios to reduce emissions were analyzed for Data Ganj Bukhsh Town (DGBT) in Lahore. Pakistan using file life cycle assessment methodology. DGBT has a population of 1,624.169 people living ill 232,024 dwellings. Total waste generated is 500,000 tons per),car with in average per capita rate of 0.84 kg per day. Alternative scenarios were developed and evaluated according to the environmental, economic. and social atmosphere of file study area. Solid waste management options considered include the collection and transportation of waste. collection of recyclables with single and mixed material bank container systems (SMBCS, MMBCS). material recovery facilities (MRF). composting, biogasification and landfilling. A life cycle inventory (LCI) of the six scenarios along with file baseline scenario was completed; this helped to quantify the CO2 equivalents, emitted and avoided, for energy consumption. production. fuel consumption and methane (CH4) emissions. LCI results showed that file contribution of the baseline scenario to the global warming potential as CO2 equivalents Was a maximum of 838,116 toils. The sixth scenario had a maximum reduction of GHG emissions in terms of CO2 equivalents of -33,773 tons, but the most workable scenario for file current situation ill file study area is scenario 5. It saves 25% ill CO2 equivalents compared to the baseline scenario. (C) 2008 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:63 / 69
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
ABBADI TA, 2005, S AIR QUAL MEAS METH
[2]  
BECK RW, 2000, 98 MINN OFF ENV ASS
[3]  
BEUKERING PV, 1999, 24 CREED
[4]  
BHATTARAI RC, 2005, J DEV RURAL STUDIES, V2, P76
[5]   Comparison of aerobic and anaerobic biotreatment of municipal solid waste [J].
Borglin, SE ;
Hazen, TC ;
Oldenburg, CM ;
Zawislanski, PT .
JOURNAL OF THE AIR & WASTE MANAGEMENT ASSOCIATION, 2004, 54 (07) :815-822
[6]   Solid waste management and plastic recycling in Austria and Europe [J].
Braunegg, G ;
Bona, R ;
Schellauf, F ;
Wallner, E .
POLYMER-PLASTICS TECHNOLOGY AND ENGINEERING, 2004, 43 (06) :1755-1767
[7]  
*CIWMB, 1998, CONDUCTING DIVERSION, V311, P80
[8]   Greenhouse gas emissions from mechanical and biological waste treatment of municipal waste [J].
Clemens, J ;
Cuhls, C .
ENVIRONMENTAL TECHNOLOGY, 2003, 24 (06) :745-754
[9]   Anaerobic digestion of solid waste: state-of-the-art [J].
De Baere, L .
WATER SCIENCE AND TECHNOLOGY, 2000, 41 (03) :283-290
[10]  
DIAZ LF, 2002, ISWA WORLD ENV C EXH