Adaptive dose selection using efficacy-toxicity trade-offs: Illustrations and practical considerations

被引:39
作者
Thall, Peter F.
Cook, John D.
Estey, Elihu H.
机构
[1] Univ Texas, MD Anderson Canc Ctr, Dept Biostat & Appl Math, Houston, TX 77030 USA
[2] Univ Texas, Dept Leukemia, Houston, TX 77030 USA
关键词
acute leukemia; adaptive design; Bayesian design; Phase I clinical trial; Phase I-II clinical trial;
D O I
10.1080/10543400600860394
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
1007 ;
摘要
The purpose of this paper is to describe and illustrate an outcome-adaptive Bayesian procedure, proposed by Thall and Cook (2004), for assigning doses of an experimental treatment to successive cohorts of patients. The method uses elicited (efficacy, toxicity) probability pairs to construct a family of trade-off contours that are used to quantify the desirability of each dose. This provides a basis for determining a best dose for each cohort. The method combines the goals of conventional Phase I and Phase II trials, and thus may be called a "Phase I-II" design. We first give a general review of the probability model and dose-finding algorithm. We next describe an application to a trial of a biologic agent for treatment of acute myelogenous leukemia, including a computer simulation study to assess the design's average behavior. To illustrate how the method may work in practice, we present a cohort-by-cohort example of a particular trial. We close with a discussion of some practical issues that may arise during implementation.
引用
收藏
页码:623 / 638
页数:16
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   A Bayesian approach to jointly modeling toxicity and biomarker expression in a phase I/II dose-finding trial [J].
Bekele, BN ;
Shen, Y .
BIOMETRICS, 2005, 61 (02) :344-354
[2]   Dose-finding based on multiple toxicities in a soft tissue sarcoma trial [J].
Bekele, BN ;
Thall, PF .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2004, 99 (465) :26-35
[3]   The bivariate continual reassessment method: extending the CRM to phase I trials of two competing outcomes [J].
Braun, TA .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 2002, 23 (03) :240-256
[4]   SIMULATION AS A DESIGN TOOL FOR PHASE I/II CLINICAL-TRIALS - AN EXAMPLE FROM BONE-MARROW TRANSPLANTATION [J].
GOOLEY, TA ;
MARTIN, PJ ;
FISHER, LD ;
PETTINGER, M .
CONTROLLED CLINICAL TRIALS, 1994, 15 (06) :450-462
[5]   A new dose-finding design for bivariate outcomes [J].
Ivanova, A .
BIOMETRICS, 2003, 59 (04) :1001-1007
[6]   BIVARIATE BINARY MODELS OF EFFICACY AND TOXICITY IN DOSE-RANGING TRIALS [J].
MURTAUGH, PA ;
FISHER, LD .
COMMUNICATIONS IN STATISTICS-THEORY AND METHODS, 1990, 19 (06) :2003-2020
[7]   Dose-finding designs for HIV studies [J].
O'Quigley, J ;
Hughes, MD ;
Fenton, T .
BIOMETRICS, 2001, 57 (04) :1018-1029
[8]   CORRELATED BINARY REGRESSION WITH COVARIATES SPECIFIC TO EACH BINARY OBSERVATION [J].
PRENTICE, RL .
BIOMETRICS, 1988, 44 (04) :1033-1048
[9]   Dose-finding based on efficacy-toxicity trade-offs [J].
Thall, PF ;
Cook, JD .
BIOMETRICS, 2004, 60 (03) :684-693
[10]   Selecting therapeutic strategies based on efficacy and death in multicourse clinical trials [J].
Thall, PF ;
Sung, HG ;
Estey, EH .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN STATISTICAL ASSOCIATION, 2002, 97 (457) :29-39