Congruency analysis of species ranking based on leaf traits:: which traits are the more reliable?

被引:125
作者
Roche, P [1 ]
Díaz-Burlinson, N [1 ]
Gachet, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Aix Marseille 3, CNRS, UMR 6116, Inst Mediterraneen Ecol & Paleoecol, F-13545 Aix En Provence, France
关键词
SLA; dry matter content; Mediterranean; France;
D O I
10.1023/B:VEGE.0000046056.94523.57
中图分类号
Q94 [植物学];
学科分类号
071001 ;
摘要
Nine leaf traits (area, fresh weight, dry weight, volume, density, thickness, specific leaf area (SLA), dry matter content (LDMC), leaf nitrogen content (LNC)) from ten plant species at eight sites in southern mediterranean France were investigated in order to assess their variability along a climatic gradient and their ranking congruency power. After examination of trait correlation patterns, we reduced the nine initial leaf traits to four traits, representative of three correlation groups: allometric traits (dry weight), functional traits (SLA and dry matter percentage) and Leaf Thickness. We analysed the variability of these four leaf traits at species and site level. We observed that between species variation (between 64.5 for SLA and 91% for LDMC) is higher than within species variation. Allowing a good congruency of species ranking assessed by spearman rank correlation () and a good reallocation of individuals to species by discriminant analysis. A site level variability (between 0.7% for Dry weight and 6.9% for SLA) was identified and environmental parameters (altitude, temperature, precipitation, nitrogen, pH) were considered as probable control factors. We found significant correlation between SLA, LDMC and the average minimum temperature (respectively r=0.87 and r=-0,9) and no correlation for the other traits or environmental parameters. Furthermore, we conclude that two leaf traits appear to be central in describing species: specific leaf area (SLA), percentage of dry matter (LDMC. While, SLA and LDMC are strongly correlated, LDMC appears to be less variable than SLA. According to our results the Dry Matter Content (or its reversal Leaf Water Content) appears the best leaf trait to be quantified for plant functional screening. Leaf thickness appeared to be rather uncorrelated with other leaf traits and show no environmental contingency; its variability could not have been explained in this study. Further studies should focus on this trait.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 48
页数:12
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], MONOGRAPHS SOIL RESO
[2]  
AUBERT G, 1978, METHODES ANAL SOLS, P90
[3]   Contribution of carbohydrate pools to the variations in leaf mass per area within a tomato plant [J].
Bertin, N ;
Tchamitchian, M ;
Baldet, P ;
Devaux, C ;
Brunel, B ;
Gary, C .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1999, 143 (01) :53-61
[4]  
Bond W.J., 1997, PLANT FUNCTIONAL TYP, P174
[5]  
BOX E O, 1982, Ecologia Mediterranea, V8, P173
[6]   Factors determining distributions of tree species and plant functional types [J].
Box, EO .
VEGETATIO, 1995, 121 (1-2) :101-116
[7]   Seedling growth, allocation and leaf attributes in a wide range of woody plant species and types [J].
Cornelissen, JHC ;
Diez, PC ;
Hunt, R .
JOURNAL OF ECOLOGY, 1996, 84 (05) :755-765
[8]   The relationships among root and leaf traits of 76 grassland species and relative abundance along fertility and disturbance gradients [J].
Craine, JM ;
Froehle, J ;
Tilman, GD ;
Wedin, DA ;
Chapin, FS .
OIKOS, 2001, 93 (02) :274-285
[9]   Plant functional types and ecosystem function in relation to global change [J].
Diaz, S ;
Cabido, M .
JOURNAL OF VEGETATION SCIENCE, 1997, 8 (04) :463-474
[10]   ANALYSIS OF SPECIFIC LEAF-AREA AND PHOTOSYNTHESIS OF 2 INBRED LINES OF PLANTAGO-MAJOR DIFFERING IN RELATIVE GROWTH-RATE [J].
DIJKSTRA, P ;
LAMBERS, H .
NEW PHYTOLOGIST, 1989, 113 (03) :283-290