On the Goals of Epistemic Education: Promoting Apt Epistemic Performance

被引:128
作者
Barzilai, Sarit [1 ]
Chinn, Clark A. [2 ]
机构
[1] Univ Haifa, Fac Educ, Haifa, Israel
[2] Rutgers State Univ, Grad Sch Educ, New Brunswick, NJ USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会; 以色列科学基金会;
关键词
PERSONAL EPISTEMOLOGY; BELIEFS; SCIENCE; METACOGNITION; COMPREHENSION; REFLECTIONS; SCIENTISTS; DIMENSIONS; PHILOSOPHY; INJUSTICE;
D O I
10.1080/10508406.2017.1392968
中图分类号
G40 [教育学];
学科分类号
040101 ; 120403 ;
摘要
Recent years have seen a surge in educational efforts to foster the development of learners' epistemologies. Our 1(st) aim is to problematize some current assumptions about the goals of epistemic education and to argue that existing models of lay or expert epistemologies cannot directly translate into educational goals. Our 2(nd) aim is to present a fresh integrative analysis of the goals of epistemic education based on both philosophical arguments and empirical research. Synthesizing these sources, we propose that the overarching purpose of epistemic education is to promote learners' apt epistemic performance, defined as performance that achieves valuable epistemic aims through competence. We identify 5 key aspects of epistemic performance that are important to achieving this goal: engaging in reliable cognitive processes that lead to the achievement of epistemic aims, adapting epistemic performance to diverse situations, metacognitively regulating and understanding epistemic performance, caring about and enjoying epistemic performance, and participating in epistemic performance together with others. Each of these aspects involves competent engagement with epistemic aims and value, epistemic ideals, and reliable epistemic processes. Our analysis can help educators plan and evaluate epistemic education and suggests ways in which current curricula might be better designed to promote epistemic growth.
引用
收藏
页码:353 / 389
页数:37
相关论文
共 132 条
[1]   Teaching With and About Nature of Science, and Science Teacher Knowledge Domains [J].
Abd-El-Khalick, Fouad .
SCIENCE & EDUCATION, 2013, 22 (09) :2087-2107
[2]  
Alexander P., 2016, Handbook of Epistemic Cognition, P100
[3]   Reading Into the Future: Competence for the 21st Century [J].
Alexander, Patricia A. .
EDUCATIONAL PSYCHOLOGIST, 2012, 47 (04) :259-280
[4]  
Alston William., 2005, Beyond Justification: Dimensions of Epistemic Evaluation
[5]  
[Anonymous], 1988, Explaining science: a cognitive approach
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2006, Hot Thought: Mechanisms and Applications of Emotional Cognition
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2016, INTELLECTUAL VIRTUES
[8]  
[Anonymous], 2012, READING HIST TEACHIN
[9]  
[Anonymous], 2011, SOCIAL EPISTEMOLOGY
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1996, VIRTUES MIND INQUIRY, DOI DOI 10.1017/CBO9781139174763