Testing for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) in the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention trial on flexible sigmoidoscopy screening: comparison with an immunochemical test for occult blood (FlexSure OBT)

被引:63
作者
Hoff, G [1 ]
Grotmol, T
Thiis-Evensen, E
Bretthauer, M
Gondal, G
Vatn, MH
机构
[1] Canc Registry Norway, N-0310 Oslo, Norway
[2] Rikshosp Univ Hosp, Res Inst Internal Med IIF, N-0027 Oslo, Norway
关键词
D O I
10.1136/gut.2004.039032
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Screening for colorectal cancer (CRC) using guaiac based faecal occult blood tests (FOBT) has an estimated programme sensitivity of >60% but <30% for strictly asymptomatic CRC in a single screening round. In search for improved non-invasive tests for screening, we compared a test for faecal calprotectin (PhiCal) with a human haemoglobin immunochemical FOBT (FlexSure OBT). Methods: In the Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) trial, screenees in one screening arm were offered screening with combined flexible sigmoidoscopy (FS) and FlexSure OBT. They were also requested to bring a fresh frozen sample of stool for the PhiCal test which was performed on samples from screenees with CRC (n = 16), high risk adenoma (n = 195), low risk adenoma (n = 592), and no adenoma (n = 1518) ( 2321 screenees in total). A positive PhiCal test was defined by a calprotectin level >= 50 mu g/g. Results: The PhiCal test was positive in 24-27% of screenees whether they had no adenoma, low risk adenoma, or high risk adenoma. Ten (63%) of 16 CRCs gave a positive PhiCal test. The total positivity rate in this population was 25% for the PhiCal test compared with 12% for FlexSure OBT, with a sensitivity for advanced neoplasia of 27% and 35%, respectively. Specificity for "any neoplasia" was 76% for the PhiCal test and 90% for FlexSure OBT. Conclusions: In colorectal screening, the performance of the PhiCal test on a single spot from one stool sample was poorer than a single screening round with FlexSure OBT and cannot be recommended for population screening purposes. The findings indicate a place for FlexSure OBT in FOBT screening.
引用
收藏
页码:1329 / 1333
页数:5
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Stool screening for colorectal cancer: evolution from occult blood to molecular markers [J].
Ahlquist, DA ;
Shuber, AP .
CLINICA CHIMICA ACTA, 2002, 315 (1-2) :157-168
[2]  
Allison JE, 1998, ALIMENT PHARM THERAP, V12, P1
[3]  
BRADSHAW P, 1995, CLIN CHEM, V41, P1360
[4]   Design, organization and management of a controlled population screening study for detection of colorectal neoplasia [J].
Bretthauer, N ;
Gondal, G ;
Larsen, IK ;
Carlsen, E ;
Eide, TJ ;
Grotmol, T ;
Skovlund, E ;
Tveit, KM ;
Vatn, MH ;
Hoff, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2002, 37 (05) :568-573
[5]   A randomised trial of the impact of new faecal haemoglobin test technologies on population participation in screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Cole, SR ;
Young, GP ;
Esterman, A ;
Cadd, B ;
Morcom, J .
JOURNAL OF MEDICAL SCREENING, 2003, 10 (03) :117-122
[6]   The Norwegian Colorectal Cancer Prevention (NORCCAP) screening study [J].
Gondal, G ;
Grotmol, T ;
Hofstad, B ;
Bretthauer, M ;
Eide, TJ ;
Hoff, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2003, 38 (06) :635-642
[7]   Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer [J].
Hardcastle, JD ;
Chamberlain, JO ;
Robinson, MHE ;
Moss, SM ;
Amar, SS ;
Balfour, TW ;
James, PD ;
Mangham, CM .
LANCET, 1996, 348 (9040) :1472-1477
[8]   CRC screening: Review of the evidence and suggestions on when and how to move on from randomized trials to screening programmes [J].
Hoff, G .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2004, 39 (02) :99-103
[9]  
Johne B, 1997, J CLIN PATHOL-MOL PA, V50, P113
[10]   A new fecal calprotectin test for colorectal neoplasia - Clinical results and comparison with previous method [J].
Johne, B ;
Kronborg, O ;
Ton, HI ;
Kristinsson, J ;
Fuglerud, P .
SCANDINAVIAN JOURNAL OF GASTROENTEROLOGY, 2001, 36 (03) :291-296