Will changes in primary care improve health outcomes? Modelling the impact of financial incentives introduced to improve quality of care in the UK

被引:42
作者
McElduff, P
Lyratzopoulos, G
Edwards, R
Heller, RF
Shekelle, P
Roland, M
机构
[1] Univ Manchester, Evidence Populat Hlth Unit, Sch Med, Sch Epidemiol & Hlth Sci, Manchester M13 9PT, Lancs, England
[2] Greater Los Angeles VA Healthcare Syst, Los Angeles, CA USA
[3] Univ Manchester, Natl Primary Care Res & Dev Ctr, Manchester, Lancs, England
来源
QUALITY & SAFETY IN HEALTH CARE | 2004年 / 13卷 / 03期
关键词
D O I
10.1136/qshc.2003.007401
中图分类号
R19 [保健组织与事业(卫生事业管理)];
学科分类号
摘要
Objectives: To estimate the total health gain from improving the quality of care among patients with cardiovascular disease in line with the quality indicator targets in the new contract for general practitioners (GPs) in the UK. Design: Statistical modelling, applying population impact measures to estimate cardiovascular health gains from achieving treatment targets in the GP contract, taking into account current levels of treatment and control. Main outcome measures: Number of events prevented in the population over 5 years applied to a notional general practice population of 10 000. Results: The greatest health gain in those aged 45-84 years would come from reaching cholesterol reduction targets. This could prevent 15 events in people with coronary heart disease, seven events in those with a history of stroke, and seven events in those with diabetes. Achieving blood pressure control targets in hypertensive patients without the above conditions could prevent 15 cardiovascular events, with further benefits from reducing blood pressure in patients with high blood pressure and coronary heart disease, stroke, or diabetes. Achieving other targets would have smaller impacts because high levels of care are already being achieved or because of the low prevalence of conditions or associated event risk. Conclusion: It is possible to quantify the health gain to a practice population of achieving quality targets such as those set in the new GP contract. The amount of health gain is sensitive to current quality of care, prevalence of conditions, and risk factors, and to the size of change anticipated. Nevertheless, it appears that significant health gains could result from achieving the proposed quality targets.
引用
收藏
页码:191 / 197
页数:7
相关论文
共 33 条
[1]   CARDIOVASCULAR-DISEASE RISK PROFILES [J].
ANDERSON, KM ;
ODELL, PM ;
WILSON, PWF ;
KANNEL, WB .
AMERICAN HEART JOURNAL, 1991, 121 (01) :293-298
[2]  
Baigent C, 2002, BMJ-BRIT MED J, V324, P71, DOI 10.1136/bmj.324.7329.71
[3]   β-blockers in congestive heart failure -: A Bayesian meta-analysis [J].
Brophy, JM ;
Joseph, L ;
Rouleau, JL .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2001, 134 (07) :550-560
[4]   Identifying predictors of high quality care in English general practice: observational study [J].
Campbell, SM ;
Hann, M ;
Hacker, J ;
Burns, C ;
Oliver, D ;
Thapar, A ;
Mead, N ;
Safran, DG ;
Roland, MO .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2001, 323 (7316) :784-787
[5]   Prevalence and management of coronary heart disease in primary care: population-based cross-sectional study using a disease register [J].
Carroll, K ;
Majeed, A ;
Firth, C ;
Gray, J .
JOURNAL OF PUBLIC HEALTH MEDICINE, 2003, 25 (01) :29-35
[6]   Effects of financial incentives on medical practice: results from a systematic review of the literature and methodological issues [J].
Chaix-Couturier, C ;
Durand-Zaleski, I ;
Jolly, D ;
Durieux, P .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL FOR QUALITY IN HEALTH CARE, 2000, 12 (02) :133-142
[7]   Prevalence of left-ventricular systolic dysfunction and heart failure in the Echocardiographic Heart of England Screening study: a population based study [J].
Davies, MK ;
Hobbs, FDR ;
Davis, RC ;
Kenkre, JE ;
Roalfe, AK ;
Hare, R ;
Wosornu, D ;
Lancashire, RJ .
LANCET, 2001, 358 (9280) :439-444
[8]  
*DEP HLTH, GEN MED SERV CONTR
[9]  
*DEP HLTH, 1999, HLTH SURV ENGL 1998
[10]  
*DEP HLTH, 2000, COMP CLIN HLTH IND