EULAR evidence based recommendations for gout.: Part I:: Diagnosis.: Report of a task force of the standing committee for international clinical studies including therapeutics (ESCISIT)

被引:462
作者
Zhang, W.
Doherty, M.
Pascual, E.
Bardin, T.
Barskova, V.
Conaghan, P.
Gerster, J.
Jacobs, J.
Leeb, B.
Liote, F.
McCarthy, G.
Netter, P.
Nuki, G.
Perez-Ruiz, F.
Pignone, A.
Pimentao, J.
Punzi, L.
Roddy, E.
Uhlig, T.
Zimmermann-Gorska, I.
机构
[1] Univ Nottingham, Acad Rheumatol, City Hosp, Nottingham NG5 1PB, England
[2] Hosp Gen Univ Alicante, Secc Rheumatol, Alicante, Spain
[3] Hop Lariboisiere, Federat Rhumatol, F-75475 Paris, France
[4] RAMS, Inst Rheumatol, Moscow, Russia
[5] Univ Leeds, Acad Unit Musculoskeletal Dis, Leeds LS16 6QB, W Yorkshire, England
[6] CHU Vaudois, Hop Nestle, Serv Rhumatol, CH-1011 Lausanne, Switzerland
[7] Univ Utrecht, Med Ctr, Dept Rheumatol & Clin, NL-3508 TA Utrecht, Netherlands
[8] Lower Austrian Ctr Rheumatol, Dept Med 2, Stockerau, Austria
[9] Hop Lariboisiere, Federat Rhumatol, F-75475 Paris, France
[10] Hop Lariboisiere, INSERM, U606, IFR 139, F-75475 Paris, France
[11] Mater Misericordiae Univ Hosp, Div Rheumatol, Dublin, Ireland
[12] Univ Henri Poincare, CNRS, UMR7561, Vandoeuvre Les Nancy, France
[13] Univ Edinburgh, Osteoarticular Res Grp, Edinburgh EH8 9YL, Midlothian, Scotland
[14] Hosp Cruces Baracaldo, Secc Rheumatol, Baracaldo, Spain
[15] Univ Florence, Dept Med Interna, I-50121 Florence, Italy
[16] Hosp Egas Monia, Rheumatol Unit, Lisbon, Portugal
[17] Univ Padua, Rheumatol Unit, I-35100 Padua, Italy
[18] Diakonhjemmet Hosp, Dept Rheumatol, Oslo, Norway
[19] Karol Marcinkowski Univ Med Sci, Dept Rheumatol Rehabil & Internal Med, Poznan, Poland
关键词
D O I
10.1136/ard.2006.055251
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 [临床医学]; 100201 [内科学];
摘要
Objective: To develop evidence based recommendations for the diagnosis of gout. Methods: The multidisciplinary guideline development group comprised 19 rheumatologists and one evidence based medicine expert, representing 13 European countries. Ten key propositions regarding diagnosis were generated using a Delphi consensus approach. Research evidence was searched systematically for each proposition. Wherever possible the sensitivity, specificity, likelihood ratio (LR), and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio were calculated for diagnostic tests. Relative risk and odds ratios were estimated for risk factors and co-morbidities associated with gout. The quality of evidence was categorised according to the evidence hierarchy. The strength of recommendation (SOR) was assessed using the EULAR visual analogue and ordinal scales. Results: 10 key propositions were generated though three Delphi rounds including diagnostic topics in clinical manifestations, urate crystal identification, biochemical tests, radiographs, and risk factors/comorbidities. Urate crystal identification varies according to symptoms and observer skill but is very likely to be positive in symptomatic gout (LR = 567 (95% confidence interval (CI), 35.5 to 9053)). Classic podagra and presence of tophi have the highest clinical diagnostic value for gout (LR = 30.64 ( 95% CI, 20.51 to 45.77), and LR = 39.95 (21.06 to 75.79), respectively). Hyperuricaemia is a major risk factor for gout and may be a useful diagnostic marker when defined by the normal range of the local population (LR = 9.74 (7.45 to 12.72)), although some gouty patients may have normal serum uric acid concentrations at the time of investigation. Radiographs have little role in diagnosis, though in late or severe gout radiographic changes of asymmetrical swelling ( LR = 4.13 ( 2.97 to 5.74)) and subcortical cysts without erosion ( LR = 6.39 (3.00 to 13.57)) may be useful to differentiate chronic gout from other joint conditions. In addition, risk factors ( sex, diuretics, purine-rich foods, alcohol, lead) and co-morbidities ( cardiovascular diseases, hypertension, diabetes, obesity, and chronic renal failure) are associated with gout. SOR for each proposition varied according to both the research evidence and expert opinion. Conclusions: 10 key recommendations for diagnosis of gout were developed using a combination of research based evidence and expert consensus. The evidence for diagnostic tests, risk factors, and co-morbidities was evaluated and the strength of recommendation was provided.
引用
收藏
页码:1301 / 1311
页数:11
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]
GOUT AND CORONARY HEART-DISEASE - THE FRAMINGHAM-STUDY [J].
ABBOTT, RD ;
BRAND, FN ;
KANNEL, WB ;
CASTELLI, WP .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 1988, 41 (03) :237-242
[2]
DEFINITIVE DIAGNOSIS OF GOUT BY IDENTIFICATION OF URATE CRYSTALS IN ASYMPTOMATIC METATARSOPHALANGEAL JOINTS [J].
AGUDELO, CA ;
WEINBERGER, A ;
SCHUMACHER, HR ;
TURNER, R ;
MOLINA, J .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1979, 22 (05) :559-560
[3]
STATISTICS NOTES - DIAGNOSTIC-TESTS-1 - SENSITIVITY AND SPECIFICITY .3. [J].
ALTMAN, DG ;
BLAND, JM .
BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1994, 308 (6943) :1552-1552
[4]
[Anonymous], CAN MED ASS J
[5]
[Anonymous], 1968, POPULATION STUDIES R
[6]
GOUTY-ARTHRITIS - A PROSPECTIVE RADIOGRAPHIC EVALUATION OF 60 PATIENTS [J].
BARTHELEMY, CR ;
NAKAYAMA, DA ;
CARRERA, GF ;
LIGHTFOOT, RW ;
WORTMANN, RL .
SKELETAL RADIOLOGY, 1984, 11 (01) :1-8
[7]
A RADIOLOGIC RE-EVALUATION OF GOUT - A STUDY OF 2,000 PATIENTS [J].
BLOCH, C ;
HERMANN, G ;
YU, TF .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF ROENTGENOLOGY, 1980, 134 (04) :781-787
[8]
PROSPECTIVE-STUDY OF GOUT IN NEW-ZEALAND MAORIS [J].
BRAUER, GW ;
PRIOR, IAM .
ANNALS OF THE RHEUMATIC DISEASES, 1978, 37 (05) :466-472
[9]
Campion E W, 1987, Am J Med, V82, P421, DOI 10.1016/0002-9343(87)90441-4
[10]
Chang SJ, 1997, J RHEUMATOL, V24, P1364