Collarless polished tapered impaction grafting of the femur during revision total hip arthroplasty - Pitfalls of the surgical technique and follow-up in 31 cases

被引:53
作者
Knight, JL [1 ]
Helming, C [1 ]
机构
[1] Grp Hlth Cooperat Puget Sound, Dept Orthopaed, Eastside Specialty Ctr, Redmond, WA 98052 USA
关键词
impaction grafting; revision total hip arthroplasty; CPT stem;
D O I
10.1016/S0883-5403(00)90088-3
中图分类号
R826.8 [整形外科学]; R782.2 [口腔颌面部整形外科学]; R726.2 [小儿整形外科学]; R62 [整形外科学(修复外科学)];
学科分类号
摘要
Impacting morcellized allograft bone into the femur during revision total hip arthroplasty is a simple concept with the goal of rebuilding femoral bone stock and providing secure fixation to the femoral stem. Using the collarless polished tapered (CPT, Zimmer, Warsaw, IN) stem impaction grafting system, we became concerned about the discrepancy between the straightforward concept and precise execution of the technique. In this study, we examined 31 consecutive procedures to determine intraoperative difficulties and report on the clinical outcome of 30 cases at an average follow-up of 31 months. Modified Harris Hip Scores averaged 41 points preoperatively and improved to 86 points at follow-up. Nineteen cases were performed on intact femora, whereas 12 cases had disrupted femoral integrity, either extended trochanteric osteotomy or periprosthetic fracture. Successful outcome was seen in all cases with an intact femur, and restoration of femoral integrity was key to successful outcome in cases with compromised femoral integrity. Among cases with disrupted femoral integrity, 3 distal Fractures occurred as a result of the rigid CPT cement plug, and 2 complete femoral fractures occurred as a result of bone impaction, for a technique-related fracture rate of 16%. Difficulty packing bone distally occurred in 94% of cases and was associated with varus and valgus stem alignment and medial and lateral stem displacement. Complete cement mantles were seen in 77% of cases. No stem subsidence was seen in 15 of 30 cases (50%). Stent subsidence of <5 mm was seen in 10 of 30, stem subsidence of 6 to 8 mm was seen in 4 of 30, and stem subsidence of >10 mm was seen in 1 patient (4%). of the patients, 87% thought the procedure improved their function, and 97% would recommend it to a friend with a failed femoral component. Although we hope that the instruments for this procedure can improve, we endorse the concept of impaction grafting with the CPT stem as a successful way of dealing with revision femoral surgery.
引用
收藏
页码:159 / 165
页数:7
相关论文
共 13 条
[1]
BROOKER AF, 1973, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V55, P8
[2]
DANTONIO J, 1993, CLIN ORTHOP RELAT R, P133
[3]
Massive early subsidence following femoral impaction grafting [J].
Eldridge, JDJ ;
Smith, EJ ;
Hubble, MJ ;
Whitehouse, SL ;
Learmonth, ID .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1997, 12 (05) :535-540
[4]
ELTING JJ, 1995, ORTHOPEDICS, V18, P107, DOI 10.3928/0147-7447-19950201-08
[5]
ELTING JJ, 1998, AM AC ORTH SURG ANN
[6]
FOWLER JL, 1988, ORTHOP CLIN N AM, V19, P477
[7]
IMPACTED CANCELLOUS ALLOGRAFTS AND CEMENT FOR REVISION TOTAL HIP-ARTHROPLASTY [J].
GIE, GA ;
LINDER, L ;
LING, RSM ;
SIMON, IP ;
SLOOFF, TJJH ;
TIMPERLEY, AJ .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND JOINT SURGERY-BRITISH VOLUME, 1993, 75 (01) :14-21
[8]
HARRIS WH, 1969, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V51, P735
[9]
JAZWAWI LM, 1999, J BONE JOINT SURG AM, V81, P844
[10]
Clinical results of the midstem porous-coated anatomic uncemented femoral stem in primary total hip arthroplasty - A five- to nine-year prospective study [J].
Knight, JL ;
Atwater, RD ;
Guo, J .
JOURNAL OF ARTHROPLASTY, 1998, 13 (05) :535-545