Building the agenda for institutional research in water resource management

被引:26
作者
Blomquist, W [1 ]
Heikkila, T
Schlager, E
机构
[1] Indiana Univ, Dept Polit Sci, Indianapolis, IN 46202 USA
[2] Columbia Univ, Sch Int & Publ Affairs, Oracle, AZ 85623 USA
[3] Univ Arizona, Sch Publ Adm & Policy, Tucson, AZ 85721 USA
来源
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN WATER RESOURCES ASSOCIATION | 2004年 / 40卷 / 04期
关键词
water resources research; institutional arrangements; water law; water management; social and political; water policy/regulation/decision making;
D O I
10.1111/j.1752-1688.2004.tb01056.x
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
This paper pursues more specifically the recommendations of a recent National Research Council report recommending greater attention to research on institutions in the field of water resource management. The important challenge for the future in institutional research lies in going beyond the observation that institutions are important and in explaining instead how institutions actually affect management options and outcomes. It is possible to illuminate the relationships between institutional features and water management through comparative institutional research. This paper offers recommendations for studying water institutions in a comparative context, including methodological recommendations concerning approaches to comparative institutional research, and topics for comparative institutional research that appear especially fruitful at this time. The example of conjunctive management. is used to illustrate the importance of institutional factors in water management, drawing to some extent on the authors' recent experience with a comparative study of conjunctive management institutions.
引用
收藏
页码:925 / 936
页数:12
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Agrawal A., 2002, DRAMA COMMONS, P41
[2]  
Allen P. T., 1998, RISK HLTH SAFETY ENV, V9, P297
[3]  
Anderson T. L., 1997, WATER MARKETS PRIMIN
[4]   PRIVATIZING THE COMMONS - AN IMPROVEMENT [J].
ANDERSON, TL ;
HILL, PJ .
SOUTHERN ECONOMIC JOURNAL, 1983, 50 (02) :438-450
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2000, Arguing about consensus: Examining the case against Western watershed initiatives and other collaborative groups active in natural resources management
[6]  
[Anonymous], ENV AG WAT RES RES 2
[7]  
[Anonymous], 1996, Water resources management: principles, regulations, and cases
[8]   The interstate river compact as a water allocation mechanism: Efficiency aspects [J].
Bennett, LL ;
Howe, CW ;
Shope, J .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF AGRICULTURAL ECONOMICS, 2000, 82 (04) :1006-1015
[9]  
Blomquist W, 2001, NAT RESOUR J, V41, P653
[10]  
Blomquist W., 2004, COMMON WATERS DIVERG