Does delay discounting play an etiological role in smoking or is it a consequence of smoking?

被引:306
作者
Audrain-McGovern, Janet [1 ]
Rodriguez, Daniel
Epstein, Leonard H. [2 ]
Cuevas, Jocelyn
Rodgers, Kelli
Wileyto, E. Paul
机构
[1] Univ Penn, Dept Psychiat, Tobacco Use Res Ctr, Philadelphia, PA 19104 USA
[2] SUNY Buffalo, Dept Pediat, Sch Med & Biomed Sci, Buffalo, NY 14214 USA
关键词
Delay discounting; Smoking acquisition; IMPULSIVE BEHAVIOR; CIGARETTE-SMOKING; SUBSTANCE USE; EARLY-ONSET; DRUG-ABUSE; 2ND GRADES; ADOLESCENTS; SYMPTOMS; TOBACCO; REWARD;
D O I
10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2008.12.019
中图分类号
R194 [卫生标准、卫生检查、医药管理];
学科分类号
摘要
Although higher delay discounting Fates have been linked to cigarette smoking, little is known about the stability of delay discounting, whether delay discounting promotes smoking acquisition, whether smoking contributes to impulsive choices, or if different relationships exist in distinct Subgroups. This study sought to fill these gaps within a prospective longitudinal cohort study (N=947) spanning mid-adolescence to young adulthood (age 15-21 years old). Smoking and delay discounting were measured across time. Covariates included peer and household smoking, academic performance, depression, novelty seeking, inattention and hyperactivity/impulsivity symptoms, and alcohol and marijuana use. The associated processes latent growth curve modeling (LGCM) with paths from the delay discounting level factor (baseline measure) and the trend factor (slope) to the smoking trend factor (slope) fit the data well, chi(2)((19, n=947)) = 15.37 p=.70, CFI=1.00, RMSEA=0, WRMR=.36. The results revealed that delay discounting did not change significantly across time. Baseline delay discounting had a significant positive effect on smoking trend (beta=.08, z=2.16, p=.03). A standard deviation (SD=1.41) increase in baseline delay discounting resulted in an 11% increase (OR=1.11, 95% Cl = 1.03, 1.23) in the odds of smoking uptake. The alternative path LCGM revealed that smoking did not significantly impact delay discounting (p's > .05). Growth mixture modeling identified three smoking trajectories: nonsmokers, early/fast smoking adopters, and slow smoking progressors. Delay discounting was higher in the smoking versus nonsmoking trajectories, but did not discriminate between the smoking trajectories, despite different acquisition patterns. Delay discounting may provide a variable by which to screen for smoking vulnerability and help identify subgroups to target for more intensive smoking prevention efforts that include novel behavioral components directed toward aspects of impulsivity. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 106
页数:8
相关论文
共 72 条
[1]  
Tablan Ofelia C, 2004, MMWR Recomm Rep, V53, P1
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1994, MMWR Recomm Rep, V43, P1
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1998, Mplus technical appendices
[4]  
Audrain J, 2002, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V11, P249
[5]  
Audrain-McGovern J, 2004, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V13, P2023
[6]   Effect of team sport participation on genetic predisposition to adolescent smoking progression [J].
Audrain-McGovern, J ;
Rodriguez, D ;
Wileyto, EP ;
Schmitz, KH ;
Shields, PG .
ARCHIVES OF GENERAL PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 63 (04) :433-441
[7]   The impact of self-control indices on peer smoking and adolescent smoking progression [J].
Audrain-McGovern, J ;
Rodriguez, D ;
Tercyak, KP ;
Neuner, G ;
Moss, HB .
JOURNAL OF PEDIATRIC PSYCHOLOGY, 2006, 31 (02) :139-151
[8]   Applying a behavioral economic framework to understanding adolescent smoking [J].
Audrain-McGovern, J ;
Rodriguez, D ;
Tercyak, KP ;
Epstein, LH ;
Goldman, P ;
Wileyto, EP .
PSYCHOLOGY OF ADDICTIVE BEHAVIORS, 2004, 18 (01) :64-73
[9]  
Audrain-McGovern J, 2003, CANCER EPIDEM BIOMAR, V12, P1121
[10]  
AUDRAINMCGOVERN J, 2001, NATL CANCER I MONOGR, V22, pCH8