Stereotype threat and performance:: How self-stereotypes influence processing by inducing regulatory foci

被引:246
作者
Seibt, B
Förster, J
机构
[1] Univ Wurzburg, Lehrstuhl Psychol 2, D-97070 Wurzburg, Germany
[2] Int Univ Bremen, Sch Humanities & Social Sci, Bremen, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1037/0022-3514.87.1.38
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
The authors hypothesized that activated self-stereotypes can influence the strategies of task solution by inducing regulatory foci. More specifically, positive self-stereotypes should induce a promotion focus state of eagerness, whereas negative stereotypes should induce a prevention focus state of vigilance. Study I showed that a negative ascribed stereotype with regard to task performance leads to better recall for avoidance-related statements whereas a positive stereotype leads to better recall for approach-related statements. In Studies 2 and 3, both an experimental manipulation of group performance expectation and the preexisting stereotype of better verbal skills in women than in men led to faster and less accurate performance in the positive as compared with the negative stereotype group. Studies 4 and 5 showed that positive in-group stereotypes led to more creative performance whereas negative stereotypes led to better analytical performance. These results point to a possible mechanism for stereotype-threat effects.
引用
收藏
页码:38 / 56
页数:19
相关论文
共 53 条
[1]  
Amabile T.M., 1996, Creativity in context: The social psychology of creativity
[2]   Stereotype susceptibility in children: Effects of identity activation on quantitative performance [J].
Ambady, N ;
Shih, M ;
Kim, A ;
Pittinsky, TL .
PSYCHOLOGICAL SCIENCE, 2001, 12 (05) :385-390
[3]  
AMTHAUER R, 1973, INTELLIGENZ STRUKTUR
[4]   When white men can't do math: Necessary and sufficient factors in stereotype threat [J].
Aronson, J ;
Lustina, MJ ;
Good, C ;
Keough, K ;
Steele, CM .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 35 (01) :29-46
[5]   THE MODERATOR MEDIATOR VARIABLE DISTINCTION IN SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGICAL-RESEARCH - CONCEPTUAL, STRATEGIC, AND STATISTICAL CONSIDERATIONS [J].
BARON, RM ;
KENNY, DA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 51 (06) :1173-1182
[6]   PUBLIC VERSUS PRIVATE EXPECTANCY OF SUCCESS - CONFIDENCE BOOSTER OR PERFORMANCE PRESSURE [J].
BAUMEISTER, RF ;
HAMILTON, JC ;
TICE, DM .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1985, 48 (06) :1447-1457
[7]   On the fragility of skilled performance: What governs choking under pressure? [J].
Beilock, SL ;
Carr, TH .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL PSYCHOLOGY-GENERAL, 2001, 130 (04) :701-725
[8]   Principles of judging valence: What makes events positive or negative? [J].
Brendl, CM ;
Higgins, ET .
ADVANCES IN EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 28 :95-160
[9]   A burden of proof: Stereotype relevance and gender differences in math performance [J].
Brown, RP ;
Josephs, RA .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1999, 76 (02) :246-257
[10]   The trouble with friendly faces: Skilled performance with a supportive audience [J].
Butler, JL ;
Baumeister, RF .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1998, 75 (05) :1213-1230