A comparison of linear and nonlinear correlation factors for basis set limit Moller-Plesset second order binding energies and structures of He2, Be2, and Ne2

被引:66
作者
Tew, David P. [1 ]
Klopper, Wim [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Karlsruhe, Lehrstuhl Theoret Chem, Inst Phys Chem, TH, D-76128 Karlsruhe, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.1063/1.2338037
中图分类号
O64 [物理化学(理论化学)、化学物理学];
学科分类号
070304 ; 081704 ;
摘要
The basis set limit Moller-Plesset second-order equilibrium bond lengths of He-2, Be-2, and Ne-2, accurate to 0.01a(0), are computed to be 5.785a(0), 5.11a(0), and 6.05a(0). The corresponding binding energies are 22.4 +/- 0.1, 2180 +/- 20, and 86 +/- 2 mu E-h, respectively. An accuracy of 95% in the binding energy requires an aug-cc-pV6Z basis or larger for conventional Moller-Plesset theory. This accuracy is obtained using an aug-cc-pV5Z basis if geminal basis functions with a linear correlation factor are included and with an aug-cc-pVQZ basis if the linear correlation factor is replaced by exp(-gamma r(12)) with gamma=1. The correlation factor r(12) exp(-gamma r(12)) does not perform as well, describing the atom more efficiently than the dimer. The geminal functions supplement the orbital basis in the description of both the short-range correlation, at electron coalescence, and the long-range dispersion correlation and the values of gamma that give the best binding energies are smaller than those that are optimum for the atom or the dimer. It is important to sufficiently reduce the error due to the resolution of the identity approximation for the three- and four-electron integrals and we recommend the complementary auxiliary basis set method. The effect of both orbital and geminal basis set superposition error must be considered to obtain accurate binding energies with small orbital basis sets. In this respect, we recommend using exp(-gamma r(12)) with localized orbitals and the original orbital-variant formalism. (c) 2006 American Institute of Physics.
引用
收藏
页数:15
相关论文
共 51 条
[1]   An exact quantum Monte Carlo calculation of the helium-helium intermolecular potential. II [J].
Anderson, JB .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2001, 115 (10) :4546-4548
[2]  
Angeli C, 2005, DALTON MOL ELECT STR
[3]   W3 theory:: Robust computational thermochemistry in the kJ/mol accuracy range [J].
Boese, AD ;
Oren, M ;
Atasoylu, O ;
Martin, JML ;
Kállay, M ;
Gauss, J .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 2004, 120 (09) :4129-4141
[4]   CALCULATION OF SMALL MOLECULAR INTERACTIONS BY DIFFERENCES OF SEPARATE TOTAL ENERGIES - SOME PROCEDURES WITH REDUCED ERRORS [J].
BOYS, SF ;
BERNARDI, F .
MOLECULAR PHYSICS, 1970, 19 (04) :553-&
[5]   Basis set superposition problem in interaction energy calculations with explicitly correlated bases: Saturated second- and third-order energies for He-2 [J].
Bukowski, R ;
Jeziorski, B ;
Szalewicz, K .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1996, 104 (09) :3306-3319
[6]   State of the art and challenges of the ab initio theory of intermolecular interactions [J].
Chalasinski, G ;
Szczesniak, MM .
CHEMICAL REVIEWS, 2000, 100 (11) :4227-4252
[7]  
Cioslowski J, 2001, QUANTUM MECH PREDICT
[8]   Gaussian-3 (G3) theory for molecules containing first and second-row atoms [J].
Curtiss, LA ;
Raghavachari, K ;
Redfern, PC ;
Rassolov, V ;
Pople, JA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1998, 109 (18) :7764-7776
[9]   GAUSSIAN-2 THEORY FOR MOLECULAR-ENERGIES OF 1ST-ROW AND 2ND-ROW COMPOUNDS [J].
CURTISS, LA ;
RAGHAVACHARI, K ;
TRUCKS, GW ;
POPLE, JA .
JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS, 1991, 94 (11) :7221-7230