Delayed visual feedback reveals distinct time scales in balance control

被引:31
作者
van den Heuvel, Maarten R. C. [1 ]
Balasubramaniam, Ramesh [2 ,3 ]
Daffertshofer, Andreas [1 ]
Longtin, Andre [3 ]
Beek, Peter J. [1 ]
机构
[1] Vrije Univ Amsterdam, Res Inst MOVE, NL-1081 BT Amsterdam, Netherlands
[2] McMaster Univ, Dept Kinesiol, Hamilton, ON L8S 4L8, Canada
[3] Univ Ottawa, Ctr Neural Dynam, Ottawa, ON K1N 6N5, Canada
基金
加拿大自然科学与工程研究理事会;
关键词
Postural control; Visual feedback; Center-of-pressure; POSTURAL CONTROL; QUIET; STIFFNESS; MOVEMENTS; DYNAMICS; STANCE;
D O I
10.1016/j.neulet.2009.01.024
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
We performed an experiment in which we challenged postural stability in 12 healthy subjects by providing artificial delayed visual feedback. A monitor at eye-height presented subjects with a visual representation of the location of their center-of-pressure (COP) and they were instructed to position their COP as accurately as possible on a small target. Visual feedback of the COP was displayed either in real-time, or delayed by 250, 500, 750, or 1000 ms. In a control condition, no visual feedback was provided. As expected, stability increased during real-time visual feedback compared to when feedback was absent. To identify time scales at which postural control during quiet stance takes place we sought to distinguish between different frequencies. Low frequencies, i.e. slow components of postural sway, showed a monotonic increase in sway amplitude with increasing delay, whereas high frequencies, i.e. fast components of postural sway, showed significantly reduced sway amplitude for delays of 500-750 ms compared to the other delay conditions. Low- and high-frequency components of postural sway thus exhibited differential susceptibility to artificial delays, thereby supporting the notion of postural control taking place on two distinct time scales. (C) 2009 Elsevier Ireland Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:37 / 41
页数:5
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]  
AMBLARD B, 1985, EXP BRAIN RES, V61, P21
[2]   DELAYED VISUAL FEEDBACK AND MOVEMENT CONTROL IN PARKINSONS-DISEASE [J].
BEUTER, A ;
MILTON, JG ;
LABRIE, C ;
GLASS, L ;
GAUTHIER, S .
EXPERIMENTAL NEUROLOGY, 1990, 110 (02) :228-235
[3]   Why we walk the way we do [J].
Breniere, Y .
JOURNAL OF MOTOR BEHAVIOR, 1996, 28 (04) :291-298
[4]   NEURAL DYNAMICS OF PLANNED ARM MOVEMENTS - EMERGENT INVARIANTS AND SPEED ACCURACY PROPERTIES DURING TRAJECTORY FORMATION [J].
BULLOCK, D ;
GROSSBERG, S .
PSYCHOLOGICAL REVIEW, 1988, 95 (01) :49-90
[5]   RANDOM WALKING DURING QUIET STANDING [J].
COLLINS, JJ ;
DE LUCA, CJ .
PHYSICAL REVIEW LETTERS, 1994, 73 (05) :764-767
[6]   PROPRIOCEPTIVE, VISUAL AND VESTIBULAR THRESHOLDS FOR THE PERCEPTION OF SWAY DURING STANDING IN HUMANS [J].
FITZPATRICK, R ;
MCCLOSKEY, DI .
JOURNAL OF PHYSIOLOGY-LONDON, 1994, 478 (01) :173-186
[7]   Multivariate Ornstein-Uhlenbeck processes with mean-field dependent coefficients: Application to postural sway [J].
Frank, T.D. ;
Daffertshofer, A. ;
Beek, P.J. .
Physical Review E - Statistical, Nonlinear, and Soft Matter Physics, 2001, 63 (1 I) :011905-011901
[8]  
GURFINKE.VS, 1974, BIOFIZIKA+, V19, P744
[9]  
Haken H., 1977, Synergetics: An Introduction, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-96363-6
[10]  
Jordan M.I., 1999, COGNITIVE NEUROSCIEN