Comparison of ecological effects and costs of communal waste management systems

被引:53
作者
Beigl, P [1 ]
Salhofer, S [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nat Resources & Appl Life Sci Vienna, BOKU, Dept Waste Management, A-1190 Vienna, Austria
关键词
life-cycle assessment; waste management system; recycling; waste management; waste transport; household waste;
D O I
10.1016/j.resconrec.2003.08.007
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
The selection of an appropriate "optimal" recycling alternative has to take into consideration both the ecological and economic effects of the entire life-cycle. The aim of this paper is to compare different waste management systems by means of a life-cycle assessment (LCA) and a cost comparison. The analysis uses data regarding the amount of household waste generated, collected and treated in a selected area in Austria. For this purpose, model-based scenarios with recycling and separate collection as well as scenarios without recycling were created. The database covers the amounts of household waste generated in the different collection schemes, the transport distances by private delivery and by regional waste management companies and data on the waste treatment processes that are widely employed throughout Austria and Germany. The resulting life-cycle inventories have been assessed according to three impact categories relevant to this topic-the global warming potential (GWP), the acidification potential (AP) and the net energy use (NEU). The results include ecological impact analyses and cost comparisons for the overall waste management systems and the waste management systems for the individual waste types-waste paper, plastic packaging, metal packaging and waste glass. Finally, a sensitivity analysis should prove the validity of the results for regions with transport distances differing from those in the area under analysis. (C) 2003 Elsevier B.V All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:83 / 102
页数:20
相关论文
共 15 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], [No title captured]
[2]  
BORKEN J, 1999, BAISISDATEN OKOLOGIS
[3]  
BUWALL, 1998, BEWERTUNG OEKOBILANZ
[4]  
COOPER L, 1997, OFFICE OFFICIAL PUBL
[5]  
GALLENKEMPER B, 1992, BEHALTERSYSTEME EINF
[6]  
GOLDEWIJK K, 1995, P C PROSP CARB SEQ B
[7]  
HARTARD S, 2000, SCHRIFTENREIHE LEHRS
[8]  
HARVEY LDD, 2000, CARBON CYCLE
[9]  
*ITU OK DARM, 1994, VERGL UNT UMW UNTRSS
[10]  
KOLLER M, 2001, MECHANISCH BIOL ABFA