Can progressive and non-progressive behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia be distinguished at presentation?

被引:60
作者
Hornberger, M. [1 ]
Shelley, B. P. [2 ,3 ]
Kipps, C. M. [2 ,4 ]
Piguet, O. [1 ]
Hodges, J. R. [1 ,2 ]
机构
[1] Univ New S Wales, Prince Wales Med Res Inst, Sydney, NSW, Australia
[2] Univ Cambridge, Dept Clin Neurosci, Cambridge CB2 1TN, England
[3] Father Muller Med Coll, Dept Neurol, Mangalore, India
[4] Univ Southampton, NHS Trust, Wessex Neurol Ctr, Southampton, Hants, England
基金
英国医学研究理事会; 澳大利亚研究理事会;
关键词
DIAGNOSTIC-CRITERIA; DISEASE; INVENTORY;
D O I
10.1136/jnnp.2008.163873
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
摘要
Background: Recent findings suggest that patients with behavioural variant frontotemporal dementia (bv-FTD) differ in their disease progression (progressive vs non-progressive patients). The current study investigates whether the two groups can be discriminated by their clinical features at first presentation. Methods: Archival clinical data of the Early Onset Dementia Clinic, Cambridge, UK, were analysed for 71 patients with bv-FTD: 45 progressive and 26 non-progressive cases with more than 3 years of follow-up. Results: The subgroups were largely indistinguishable on the basis of the presenting clinical features but could be distinguished on general cognitive (Addenbrooke's Cognitive Examination-revised) and selected supportive diagnostic features (distractibility, stereotypic speech, impaired activities of daily living (ADLs) and current depression). Conclusions: Progressive and non-progressive patients are difficult to differentiate on the basis of current clinical diagnostic criteria for FTD but a combination of general cognitive, executive dysfunction and impaired ADL measures appear to be the most promising discriminators.
引用
收藏
页码:591 / 593
页数:3
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   Progression in frontotemporal dementia - Identifying a benign Behavioral variant by magnetic resonance imaging [J].
Davies, Rhys R. ;
Kipps, Christopher M. ;
Mitchell, Joanna ;
Kril, Jillian J. ;
Halliday, Glenda M. ;
Hodges, John R. .
ARCHIVES OF NEUROLOGY, 2006, 63 (11) :1627-1631
[2]   Pathologically proven frontotemporal dementia presenting with severe amnesia [J].
Graham, A ;
Davies, R ;
Xuereb, J ;
Halliday, G ;
Kril, J ;
Creasey, H ;
Graham, K ;
Hodges, J .
BRAIN, 2005, 128 :597-605
[3]  
Gregory CA, 1997, INT J GERIATR PSYCH, V12, P375, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1166(199703)12:3<375::AID-GPS518>3.0.CO
[4]  
2-#
[5]  
Hodges J.R., 2007, Cognitive assessment for clinicians
[6]   Executive function in progressive and nonprogressive behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia [J].
Hornberger, Michael ;
Piguet, Olivier ;
Kipps, Christopher ;
Hodges, John R. .
NEUROLOGY, 2008, 71 (19) :1481-1488
[7]   Measuring progression in frontotemporal dementia - Implications for therapeutic interventions [J].
Kipps, C. M. ;
Nestor, P. J. ;
Dawson, C. E. ;
Mitchell, J. ;
Hodges, J. R. .
NEUROLOGY, 2008, 70 (22) :2046-2052
[8]   Clinical significance of lobar atrophy in frontotemporal dementia: Application of an MRI visual rating scale [J].
Kipps, Christopher M. ;
Davies, R. Rhys ;
Mitchell, Joanna ;
Kril, Jillian J. ;
Halliday, Glenda M. ;
Hodges, John R. .
DEMENTIA AND GERIATRIC COGNITIVE DISORDERS, 2007, 23 (05) :334-342
[9]   Activities of daily living in frontotemporal dementia and Alzheimer disease [J].
Mioshi, E. ;
Kipps, C. M. ;
Dawson, K. ;
Mitchell, J. ;
Graham, A. ;
Hodges, J. R. .
NEUROLOGY, 2007, 68 (24) :2077-2084
[10]  
Mioshi E, ALZHEIMER D IN PRESS