Altered allergen binding capacities of Amb a 1-specific IgE and IgG4 from ragweed-sensitive patients receiving immunotherapy

被引:27
作者
Pierson-Mullany, LK
Jackola, D
Blumenthal, M
Rosenberg, A
机构
[1] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Ctr Asthma & Allergy, Dept Med, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
[2] Univ Minnesota, Sch Med, Dept Lab Med & Pathol, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S1081-1206(10)62761-5
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Background: The mechanisms for the effectiveness of allergen immunotherapy (IT) are not well understood. The binding potential for immunoglobulins is a function of both antibody concentration and affinity (K-A). Purpose: The purpose was to perform a cross-sectional preliminary study to investigate any differences in allergen-specific antibody affinity and concentration following ragweed immunotherapy by introducing a new concept of antibody binding capacity ([Ig] X K-A). Methods: The binding capacity of allergen-specific IgE and IgG4 was determined for ragweed-allergic individuals undergoing ragweed immunotherapy and compared with the capacity of ragweed-specific IgE and IgG4 for allergic individuals not receiving immunotherapy. Results: The mean binding capacity for IgG4 after long-term immunotherapy was 1.6 log units higher (P < .0001) than for individuals not receiving IT. The binding capacity for allergen-specific IgE was 1.2 log units lower following long-term immunotherapy (P < .0001) compared with individuals not receiving ragweed IT. Conclusions: We hypothesize that a primary effect of immunotherapy is to increase IgG4 binding capacity and concomitantly decrease IgE binding capacity.
引用
收藏
页码:241 / 243
页数:3
相关论文
共 11 条
[1]   Immunologic changes associated with allergen immunotherapy [J].
Durham, SR ;
Till, SJ .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1998, 102 (02) :157-164
[2]  
GERSHON RK, 1971, J IMMUNOL, V106, P872
[3]   AFFINITY AND TEMPORAL VARIATION OF ISOELECTRIC FRACTIONS OF RABBIT ANTI-LACTOSE ANTIBODY [J].
GHOSE, AC ;
KARUSH, F .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 1973, 12 (13) :2437-2443
[4]   Mechanisms of specific immunotherapy of allergic diseases [J].
Kowalski, ML ;
Jutel, M .
ALLERGY, 1998, 53 (05) :485-492
[5]   LOW AND HIGH AFFINITY ANTIBODIES CAN ALTERNATE DURING IMMUNE-RESPONSE [J].
MACARIO, AJL ;
MACARIO, ECD .
NATURE, 1973, 245 (5423) :263-264
[6]   QUANTITATIVE IGE-SUBCLASS AND IGG-SUBCLASS RESPONSES DURING AND AFTER LONG-TERM RAGWEED IMMUNOTHERAPY [J].
PENG, ZK ;
NACLERIO, RM ;
NORMAN, PS ;
ADKINSON, NF .
JOURNAL OF ALLERGY AND CLINICAL IMMUNOLOGY, 1992, 89 (02) :519-529
[7]   An automated method for determination of antibody affinity distribution functions with nanogram quantities [J].
Pierson, L ;
Allauzen, S ;
Blumenthal, M ;
Rosenberg, A .
JOURNAL OF IMMUNOLOGICAL METHODS, 1998, 211 (1-2) :97-109
[8]  
STEWARD MW, 1981, IMMUNOL TODAY JUL, P134
[9]  
Steward MW, 1983, ANTIBODY AFFINITY TH
[10]  
URBAIN J, 1977, ANN INST PASTEUR IMM, VC128, P445