Using analytic hierarchy process (AHP) to improve human performance: An application of multiple criteria decision making problem

被引:222
作者
Albayrak, E
Erensal, YC
机构
[1] Galatasaray Univ, Ind Engn Fac, TR-80840 Istanbul, Turkey
[2] Dogus Univ, Ind Engn Fac, TR-34722 Istanbul, Turkey
关键词
decision making; performance management; analytic hierarchy process; human performance;
D O I
10.1023/B:JIMS.0000034112.00652.4c
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
In the global economy, the modem commercial and industrial organization needs to develop better methods of assessing the performance of the human resource than simply using performance measures such as efficiency or effectiveness. As organizations seek more aggressive ways to cut costs and to increase global competitiveness, the importance of establishing and sustaining high levels of employee performance increases. The main purpose of this paper is to solve the human performance improvement problem by employing Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP) method. Decision makers (DMs) often deal with problems that involve multiple criteria. At given moments in time, companies will display characteristics that make certain factors; key factors in their competences. In this paper, we present a model, which illustrates the relations and importance between human performance improvement and the style of management. In using the AHP to model this problem, we developed a hierarchic structure to represent the problem of human performance management and made pairwise comparisons. In this paper, the AHP is suggested as a tool for implementing a multiple criteria performance improvement scheme. The AHP was used for the purpose of structuring and clarifying the relations and importance between human performance improvement and the style of management. The study found that in terms of company culture, participation, human capability, and attitudes the best management style in improving human performance is management by values.
引用
收藏
页码:491 / 503
页数:13
相关论文
共 33 条
  • [1] [Anonymous], 1995, EUR J OPER RES
  • [2] [Anonymous], 2000, INT J BANK MARK
  • [3] Argyris Chris., 1971, MANAGEMENT ORG DEV
  • [4] ARTHUR JB, 1994, ACAD MANAGE J, V37, P670, DOI 10.5465/256705
  • [5] BROWN O, 1996, HUMAN FACTORS ORG DE, V5, P187
  • [6] CARROLL SJ, 1973, MANAGEMENT OBJECTIVE
  • [7] CHIU RK, 1998, QUALITY MANAGEMENT, V14, P8
  • [8] Cotton J.L., 1993, EMPLOYEE INVOLVEMENT
  • [9] DALE BG, 1997, MANAGING QUALITY HUM
  • [10] Department of Trade and Industry (DTI), 1991, ORG PEOPL TECHN EX G