EORTC phase II study of daily oral linomide in metastatic renal cell carcinoma patients with good prognostic factors

被引:9
作者
deWit, R
Pawinsky, A
Stoter, G
vanOosterom, AT
Fossa, SD
Paridaens, R
Svedberg, A
deMulder, PHM
机构
[1] EORTC DATA CTR, B-1200 BRUSSELS, BELGIUM
[2] UNIV ANTWERP HOSP, B-2520 EDEGEM, BELGIUM
[3] NORWEGIAN RADIUM HOSP, OSLO 3, NORWAY
[4] UNIV HOSP ST RAPHAEL, B-3000 LOUVAIN, BELGIUM
[5] PHARMACIA AB, S-22007 LUND, SWEDEN
[6] ACAD HOSP NIJMEGEN, NL-6525 GA NIJMEGEN, NETHERLANDS
关键词
linomide; immunotherapy; renal cell carcinoma;
D O I
10.1016/S0959-8049(97)89027-2
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 ;
摘要
Following a previous EORTC GU-Group study, in which linomide showed some activity in poor prognosis patients, this study was initiated to determine the effect of linomide in more favourable patients. 35 patients with metastatic renal cell carcinoma with good prognostic factors, i.e. good performance status, prior nephrectomy, no prior systemic therapy, and no liver, bone or brain metastases, were treated with linomide, a quinoline derivative with immunomodulating properties, at a dose of 10 mg daily, after an initial dose escalation during the first 4 weeks of treatment. In 29 evaluable patients, no responses were observed (95% confidence interval 0-10%). Best overall response was no change in 9 patients, for a median duration of 4 months. Linomide in this schedule was poorly tolerated, with 17% (6 patients) of patients being withdrawn and 23% (8 patients) having dose reductions due to adverse events, mostly influenza-like symptoms of myalgia, arthralgia and fatigue. Several cases of pericarditis and neuropathy were observed. In spite of selection of favourable prognosis patients and an optimal daily dosing schedule, linomide was not an effective treatment in renal cell carcinoma. In view of toxicity and lack of efficacy, there is no rationale in further testing the drug in this disease. (C) 1997 Published by Elsevier Science Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:493 / 495
页数:3
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ELSON PJ, 1988, CANCER RES, V48, P7310
[2]  
KALLAND T, 1986, CANCER RES, V46, P3018
[3]  
KALLAND T, 1985, J IMMUNOL, V134, P3956
[4]   MECHANISM OF ACTION OF THE NEW IMMUNOMODULATOR LS2616 ON T-CELL RESPONSES [J].
LARSSON, EL ;
JOKI, A ;
STALHANDSKE, T .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 1987, 9 (04) :425-431
[5]   PROGNOSTIC FACTORS FOR SURVIVAL IN PATIENTS WITH ADVANCED RENAL-CELL CARCINOMA TREATED WITH RECOMBINANT INTERLEUKIN-2 [J].
PALMER, PA ;
VINKE, J ;
PHILIP, T ;
NEGRIER, S ;
ATZOPODIEN, J ;
KIRCHNER, H ;
OSKAM, R ;
FRANKS, CR .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1992, 3 (06) :475-480
[6]   An EORTC phase II study of the efficacy and safety of linomide in the treatment of advanced renal cell carcinoma [J].
Pawinski, A ;
vanOosterom, AT ;
deWit, R ;
Fossa, S ;
Croles, J ;
Svedberg, A ;
Lentz, MA ;
deMulder, PHM .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF CANCER, 1997, 33 (03) :496-499
[7]   A NOVEL QUINOLINECARBOXAMIDE WITH INTERESTING IMMUNOMODULATORY ACTIVITY [J].
STALHANDSKE, T ;
ERIKSOO, E ;
SANDBERG, BM .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF IMMUNOPHARMACOLOGY, 1982, 4 (04) :336-336
[8]   SUCCESSFUL TREATMENT OF AUTOIMMUNITY IN MRL/1 MICE WITH LS-2616, A NEW IMMUNOMODULATOR [J].
TARKOWSKI, A ;
GUNNARSSON, K ;
NILSSON, LA ;
LINDHOLM, L ;
STALHANDSKE, T .
ARTHRITIS AND RHEUMATISM, 1986, 29 (11) :1405-1409