Variation of DNA fingerprints among accessions within maize inbred lines and implications for identification of essentially derived varieties. I. Genetic and technical sources of variation in SSR data

被引:80
作者
Heckenberger, M
Bohn, M [1 ]
Ziegle, JS
Joe, LK
Hauser, JD
Hutton, M
Melchinger, AE
机构
[1] Univ Hohenheim, Inst Plant Breeding Seed Sci & Populat Genet, D-70593 Stuttgart, Germany
[2] Celera AgGen, Davis, CA 95616 USA
关键词
essentially derived varieties; genetic distances; intra-varietal variation; reproducibility; SSRs;
D O I
10.1023/A:1020539330957
中图分类号
S3 [农学(农艺学)];
学科分类号
0901 ;
摘要
Genetic distances (GDs) based on molecular markers are important parameters for identifying essentially derived varieties (EDVs). In this context information about the variability of molecular markers within maize inbred lines is essential. Our objectives were to (1) determine the variation in the size of simple sequence repeat (SSR) fragments among different accessions of maize inbreds and doubled haploid (DH) lines, (2) attribute the observed variation to genetic and marker system-specific sources, and (3) investigate the effect of SSR fragment size differences within maize lines on the GD between maize lines and their consequences for the identification of essentially derived varieties. Two to five accessions from nine inbred lines and five DH lines were taken from different sources or drawn as independent samples from the same seed lot. Each accession was genotyped with 100 SSR markers that evenly covered the whole maize genome. In total, 437 SSR fragments were identified, with a mean of 4.4 alleles per locus. The average polymorphic information content (PIC) was 0.58. GD estimates between two accessions of the same genotype ranged from 0.00 to 0.12 with an average of 0.029 for inbred lines and 0.001 for DH lines. An average of 11.1 SSRs was polymorphic between accessions of the same inbred line due to non-amplification (8.1 SSRs), heterogeneity (4.0 SSRs) or unknown alleles (2.6 SSRs). In contrast to lab errors, heterogeneity contributed considerably to the observed variation for GD. In order to decrease the probability to be suited for infringing an EDV threshold by chance, we recommend to increase the level of homogeneity of inbred lines before applying for plant variety protection.
引用
收藏
页码:181 / 191
页数:11
相关论文
共 37 条
[1]  
Allard R.W., 1999, PRINCIPLES PLANT BRE
[2]  
[Anonymous], 1988, SAS STAT US GUID
[3]  
*ASSINSEL, 2000, DUS TEST PHEN GEN
[4]  
ASSINSEL, 1999, CONS ASSINSEL POS PA
[5]   RFLP-based estimates of parental contribution to F-2- and BC1-derived maize inbreds [J].
Bernardo, R ;
Murigneux, A ;
Maisonneuve, JP ;
Johnsson, C ;
Karaman, Z .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1997, 94 (05) :652-656
[6]  
BOTSTEIN D, 1980, AM J HUM GENET, V32, P314
[7]  
Deimling S, 1997, VORTR PFLANZENZUCHTG, V38, P203
[8]  
Drake JW, 1998, GENETICS, V148, P1667
[9]   1977 RIETZ LECTURE - BOOTSTRAP METHODS - ANOTHER LOOK AT THE JACKKNIFE [J].
EFRON, B .
ANNALS OF STATISTICS, 1979, 7 (01) :1-26
[10]   Identifying the loci responsible for natural variation in fruit size and shape in tomato [J].
Grandillo, S ;
Ku, HM ;
Tanksley, SD .
THEORETICAL AND APPLIED GENETICS, 1999, 99 (06) :978-987