Calcium channel blockers and cardiovascular outcomes: a meta-analysis of 175 634 patients

被引:86
作者
Costanzo, Pierluigi [1 ]
Perrone-Filardi, Pasquale [1 ]
Petretta, Mario [1 ]
Marciano, Caterina [1 ]
Vassallo, Enrico [1 ]
Gargiulo, Paola [1 ]
Paolillo, Stefania [1 ]
Petretta, Andrea [1 ]
Chiariello, Massimo [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Naples Federico 2, Dept Internal Med Cardiovasc Sci & Immunol, Naples, Italy
关键词
calcium channel blockers; cardiovascular death; heart failure; hypertension; major cardiovascular events; myocardial infarction; stroke; RANDOMIZED CONTROLLED-TRIAL; ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG-TREATMENT; ISOLATED SYSTOLIC HYPERTENSION; CONVERTING ENZYME-INHIBITORS; CORONARY-ARTERY-DISEASE; INTIMA-MEDIA THICKNESS; BLOOD-PRESSURE; DOUBLE-BLIND; PUBLICATION BIAS; HEART-DISEASE;
D O I
10.1097/HJH.0b013e3283281254
中图分类号
R6 [外科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100210 ;
摘要
Objective The aim of this study was to assess the effect of calcium channel blocker (CCB) treatment, compared with other drugs or placebo/top of therapy, on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular death, major cardiovascular events, heart failure, myocardial infarction and stroke. Methods We performed a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials that compared a long-acting calcium channel blocker with another drug or placebo/top of therapy and that assessed all-cause mortality and cardiovascular events. Results We included 27 trials (175 634 patients). The risk of all-cause death was reduced by dihydropyridine CCBs [odds ratio (OR) 0.96; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.93-0.99; comparison P = 0.026; heterogeneity P = 0.87)] without influence of placebo trials. The risk of heart failure was increased by CCBs compared with active treatment (OR 1.17; 95% CI 1.11-1.24; comparison P = 0.0001; heterogeneity P = 0.0001), and it was decreased when compared with placebo (OR 0.72; 95% CI 0.59-0.87; comparison P = 0.001; heterogeneity P = 0.77), also in the subgroup of coronary artery disease patients (OR 0.76; 95% CI 0.61-0.95; comparison P = 0.01; heterogeneity P = 0.29). CCBs did not increase the risk of myocardial infarction (OR 1; 95% CI 0.95-1.04; comparison P = 0.83, heterogeneity P = 0.004), cardiovascular death (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.93-1.02; comparison P = 0.24; heterogeneity P = 0.16), major cardiovascular events (OR 0.97; 95% CI 0.90-1.06; comparison P = 0.53; heterogeneity P = 0.0001). CCBs decreased the risk of fatal or nonfatal stroke (OR 0.86; 95% CI 0.82-0.90; comparison P = 0.0001, heterogeneity P = 0.12), also, when compared with angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors (OR 0.87; 95% CI 0.78-0.97; comparison P = 0.016; heterogeneity P = 0.48). Conclusion Our study demonstrates that CCBs reduce the risk of all-cause mortality compared with active therapy and prevent heart failure compared with placebo. Furthermore, with the inclusion of recent trials, we confirm that they reduce the risk of stroke, also in comparison to angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and do not increase the risk of cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction and major cardiovascular events. J Hypertens 27:1136-1151 (C) 2009 Wolters Kluwer Health vertical bar Lippincott Williams & Wilkins.
引用
收藏
页码:1136 / U56
页数:19
相关论文
共 55 条
  • [1] AIKIN M, 1996, AM J PUBLIC HEALTH, V86, P726
  • [2] [Anonymous], STATA TECH B REPRINT
  • [3] [Anonymous], STATA TECH B
  • [4] [Anonymous], METAANALYSIS CONTROL
  • [5] Evaluation of the effect of oral verapamil on clinical outcome and angiographic -: Restenosis after percutaneous coronary intervention -: The randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicenter verapamil slow-release for prevention of cardiovascular events after angioplasty (VESPA) trial
    Bestehorn, HP
    Neumann, FJ
    Büttner, HJ
    Betz, P
    Stürzenhofecker, P
    von Hodenberg, E
    Verdun, A
    Levai, L
    Monassier, JP
    Roskamm, H
    [J]. JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF CARDIOLOGY, 2004, 43 (12) : 2160 - 2165
  • [6] Principal results of the Controlled Onset Verapamil Investigation of Cardiovascular End Points (CONVINCE) Trial
    Black, HR
    Elliott, WJ
    Grandits, G
    Grambsch, P
    Lucente, T
    White, WB
    Neaton, JD
    Grimm, RH
    Hansson, L
    Lacourcière, Y
    Muller, J
    Sleight, P
    Weber, MA
    Williams, G
    Wittes, J
    Zanchetti, A
    Anders, RJ
    [J]. JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2003, 289 (16): : 2073 - 2082
  • [7] Much ado about nothing: a comparison of the performance of meta-analytical methods with rare events
    Bradburn, Michael J.
    Deeks, Jonathan J.
    Berlin, Jesse A.
    Localio, A. Russell
    [J]. STATISTICS IN MEDICINE, 2007, 26 (01) : 53 - 77
  • [8] Morbidity and mortality in patients randomised to double-blind treatment with a long-acting calcium-channel blocker or diuretic in the International Nifedipine GITS study: Intervention as a Goal in Hypertension Treatment (INSIGHT)
    Brown, MJ
    Palmer, CR
    Castaigne, A
    de Leeuw, PW
    Mancia, G
    Rosenthal, T
    Ruilope, LM
    [J]. LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) : 366 - 372
  • [9] CASIGLIA E, 1994, JPN HEART J, V35, P589
  • [10] BLOOD-PRESSURE, ANTIHYPERTENSIVE DRUG-TREATMENT AND THE RISKS OF STROKE AND OF CORONARY HEART-DISEASE
    COLLINS, R
    MACMAHON, S
    [J]. BRITISH MEDICAL BULLETIN, 1994, 50 (02) : 272 - 298