How long should a trial of escitalopram treatment be in patients with major depressive disorder, generalised anxiety disorder or social anxiety disorder? An exploration of the randomised controlled trial database

被引:39
作者
Baldwin, David S. [1 ]
Stein, Dan J. [2 ]
Dolberg, Ornah T. [3 ]
Bandelow, Borwin [4 ]
机构
[1] Univ Southampton, Sch Med, Clin Neurosci Div, Southampton, Hants, England
[2] Univ Cape Town, MRC Unit Anxiety Disorders, ZA-7925 Cape Town, South Africa
[3] H Lundbeck & Co AS, Copenhagen, Denmark
[4] Univ Gottingen, Dept Psychiat & Psychotherapy, Gottingen, Germany
关键词
treatment; response; escitalopram; onset of action; PRIMARY-CARE PATIENTS; DOUBLE-BLIND; ANTIDEPRESSANT ACTION; TERM TREATMENT; 10; MG/DAY; FLUOXETINE; PAROXETINE; EFFICACY; 24-WEEK; ONSET;
D O I
10.1002/hup.1019
中图分类号
R74 [神经病学与精神病学];
学科分类号
100204 [神经病学];
摘要
Objective To extend the knowledge of course of improvement in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD), social anxiety disorder (SAD) or generalised anxiety disorder (GAD) participating in randomised placebo-controlled trials (RCTs) and to infer the optimal duration of initial escitalopram treatment in clinical practice, after which intervention might be reasonable in case of non-response. Methods Post hoc analysis of pooled clinical trial database for escitalopram in MDD (14 studies), GAD (4 studies) and SAD (2 studies). 'Onset' of action was defined as a 20% or more decrease from baseline score in disorder-specific psychopathological rating scales: 'response' as a 50% or more decrease from baseline score. Results In MDD, the probability of responding at week 8 if no onset was apparent at week 2 was 43%; in patients with an onset of effect the probability was nearly 80%. Similar patterns were observed in GAD and SAD. The chance of responding beyond week 4 in MDD, GAD and SAD was 20% or less if no effect had occurred by week 2. Conclusions The pattern of response in these RCTs suggests that in patients with MDD, GAD or SAD in wider clinical practice, a period of at least 4 weeks is worthwhile before considering further intervention. Copyright (C) 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:269 / 275
页数:7
相关论文
共 45 条
[1]
Alexopoulos GS, 2004, NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOL, V29, pS87
[2]
ALEXOPOULOS GS, 2004, WORLD J BIOL PSYC S1, V5, P97
[3]
Prevention of relapse in generalized anxiety disorder by escitalopram treatment [J].
Allgulander, Christer ;
Florea, Ioana ;
Huusom, Anna K. Trap .
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF NEUROPSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 9 (05) :495-505
[4]
[Anonymous], 2004, CLIN TRIALS PSYCHIAT
[5]
Escitalopram and paroxetine in the treatment of generalised anxiety disorder - Randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind study [J].
Baldwin, David S. ;
Huusom, Anna Karina Trap ;
Maehlum, Eli .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF PSYCHIATRY, 2006, 189 :264-272
[6]
A double-blind, randomized, parallel-group, flexible-dose study to evaluate the tolerability, efficacy and effects of treatment discontinuation with escitalopram and paroxetine in patients with major depressive disorder [J].
Baldwin, DS ;
Cooper, JA ;
Huusom, AKT ;
Hindmarch, I .
INTERNATIONAL CLINICAL PSYCHOPHARMACOLOGY, 2006, 21 (03) :159-169
[7]
Bech P, 2001, INT J NEUROPSYCHOPH, V4, P337, DOI 10.1017/S1461145701002565
[8]
Effective dose of escitalopram in moderate versus severe DSM-IV major depression [J].
Bech, P. ;
Andersen, H. F. ;
Wade, A. .
PHARMACOPSYCHIATRY, 2006, 39 (04) :128-134
[9]
A double-blind comparison of escitalopram and venlafaxine extended release in the treatment of major depressive disorder [J].
Bielski, RJ ;
Ventura, D ;
Chang, CC .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHIATRY, 2004, 65 (09) :1190-1196
[10]
Bielski Robert J, 2005, Ann Clin Psychiatry, V17, P65, DOI 10.1080/10401230590932326