The apparent cooperativity of some GPCRs does not necessarily imply dimerization

被引:86
作者
Chabre, Marc [1 ]
Deterre, Philippe [2 ]
Antonny, Bruno [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Nice Sophia Antipolis, CNRS, Inst Pharmacol Mol & Cellulaire, F-06560 Valbonne, France
[2] Univ Paris 06, INSERM, Lab Immunol Cellulaire, UPMC, F-75013 Paris, France
关键词
PROTEIN-COUPLED RECEPTOR; DELTA-OPIOID RECEPTORS; TERNARY COMPLEX MODEL; PHOTOEXCITED RHODOPSIN; BINDING-PROPERTIES; NUCLEOTIDE SITE; TRANSDUCIN; ACTIVATION; MEMBRANES; AFFINITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.tips.2009.01.003
中图分类号
R9 [药学];
学科分类号
100702 [药剂学];
摘要
When the binding of one ligand to its receptor is influenced by a second ligand acting on a different receptor, one might assume that the receptors dimerize, enabling allosteric interactions between ligands. This reasoning is frequently used to explain the complex binding curves of ligands of class A G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs). Here, we argue that in classical in vitro experiments the lack of GTP makes ligand-binding properties dependent on the available pool of G protein. Under such conditions a 1:1 GPCR-G-protein complex is stabilized, in which the G protein lacks a nucleotide and ligand binding is of high affinity. In vivo, this complex, a key intermediate of G-protein activation, never accumulates because of fast and irreversible GTP binding. In vitro, this complex creates interference in ligand binding when two monomeric GPCRs compete for the same G protein. Interestingly, this competition explains some in vivo effects of orphan GPCRs.
引用
收藏
页码:182 / 187
页数:6
相关论文
共 39 条
[1]
The receptor-bound "empty pocket" state of the heterotrimeric G-protein α-subunit is conformationally dynamic [J].
Abdulaev, Najmoutin G. ;
Ngo, Tony ;
Ramon, Eva ;
Brabazon, Danielle M. ;
Marino, John P. ;
Ridge, Kevin D. .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2006, 45 (43) :12986-12997
[2]
Transducin activation by nanoscale lipid bilayers containing one and two rhodopsins [J].
Bayburt, Timothy H. ;
Leitz, Andrew J. ;
Xie, Guifu ;
Oprian, Daniel D. ;
Sligar, Stephen G. .
JOURNAL OF BIOLOGICAL CHEMISTRY, 2007, 282 (20) :14875-14881
[3]
CAN DIFFERENT RECEPTORS INTERACT DIRECTLY WITH EACH OTHER [J].
BIRDSALL, NJM .
TRENDS IN NEUROSCIENCES, 1982, 5 (05) :137-138
[4]
Molecular tinkering of G protein-coupled receptors: an evolutionary success [J].
Bockaert, J ;
Pin, JP .
EMBO JOURNAL, 1999, 18 (07) :1723-1729
[5]
THE TRANSITORY COMPLEX BETWEEN PHOTOEXCITED RHODOPSIN AND TRANSDUCIN - RECIPROCAL INTERACTION BETWEEN THE RETINAL SITE IN RHODOPSIN AND THE NUCLEOTIDE SITE IN TRANSDUCIN [J].
BORNANCIN, F ;
PFISTER, C ;
CHABRE, M .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1989, 184 (03) :687-698
[6]
KINETIC-ANALYSIS OF THE ACTIVATION OF TRANSDUCIN BY PHOTOEXCITED RHODOPSIN - INFLUENCE OF THE LATERAL DIFFUSION OF TRANSDUCIN AND COMPETITION OF GUANOSINE DIPHOSPHATE AND GUANOSINE TRIPHOSPHATE FOR THE NUCLEOTIDE SITE [J].
BRUCKERT, F ;
CHABRE, M ;
VUONG, TM .
BIOPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 63 (03) :616-629
[7]
Monomeric G-protein-coupled receptor as a functional unit [J].
Chabre, M ;
le Maire, M .
BIOCHEMISTRY, 2005, 44 (27) :9395-9403
[8]
Biophysics - Is rhodopsin dimeric in native rods? [J].
Chabre, M ;
Cone, R ;
Saibil, H .
NATURE, 2003, 426 (6962) :30-31
[9]
MOLECULAR MECHANISM OF VISUAL TRANSDUCTION [J].
CHABRE, M ;
DETERRE, P .
EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF BIOCHEMISTRY, 1989, 179 (02) :255-266
[10]
G protein-coupled receptor allosterism and complexing [J].
Christopoulos, A ;
Kenakin, T .
PHARMACOLOGICAL REVIEWS, 2002, 54 (02) :323-374