A combined deep-learning and deformable-model approach to fully automatic segmentation of the left ventricle in cardiac MRI

被引:445
作者
Avendi, M. R. [1 ,2 ]
Kheradvar, Arash [2 ]
Jafarkhani, Hamid [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Calif Irvine, Ctr Pervas Commun & Comp, Irvine, CA USA
[2] Univ Calif Irvine, Edwards Lifesci Ctr Adv Cardiovasc Technol, Irvine, CA USA
关键词
Caridac MRI; LV segmentation; Deep learning; Machine learning; Deformable models; SHORT-AXIS; REGISTRATION; IMAGES; SET; ATLAS;
D O I
10.1016/j.media.2016.01.005
中图分类号
TP18 [人工智能理论];
学科分类号
081104 ; 0812 ; 0835 ; 1405 ;
摘要
Segmentation of the left ventricle (LV) from cardiac magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) datasets is an essential step for calculation of clinical indices such as ventricular volume and ejection fraction. In this work, we employ deep learning algorithms combined with deformable models to develop and evaluate a fully automatic LV segmentation tool from short-axis cardiac MRI datasets. The method employs deep learning algorithms to learn the segmentation task from the ground true data. Convolutional networks are employed to automatically detect the LV chamber in MRI dataset. Stacked autoencoders are used to infer the LV shape. The inferred shape is incorporated into deformable models to improve the accuracy and robustness of the segmentation. We validated our method using 45 cardiac MR datasets from the MICCAI 2009 LV segmentation challenge and showed that it outperforms the state-of-the art methods. Excellent agreement with the ground truth was achieved. Validation metrics, percentage of good contours, Dice metric, average perpendicular distance and conformity, were computed as 96.69%, 0.94, 1.81 mm and 0.86, versus those of 79.2 95.62%, 0.87-0.9, 1.76-2.97 mm and 0.67-0.78, obtained by other methods, respectively. (C) 2016 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:108 / 119
页数:12
相关论文
共 61 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 2014, INT C LEARN REPR
[2]   Embedding Overlap Priors in Variational Left Ventricle Tracking [J].
Ayed, Ismail Ben ;
Li, Shuo ;
Ross, Ian .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON MEDICAL IMAGING, 2009, 28 (12) :1902-1913
[3]  
Babalola K.O., 2008, COMP EVALUATION SEGM, P409, DOI [DOI 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_49, 10.1007/978-3-540-85988-8_49]
[4]  
Baldi P., 2012, P ICML WORKSH UNS TR, V27, P37, DOI DOI 10.1561/2200000006
[5]  
Barajas J., 2006, 1 INT WORKSH COMP VI, P114
[6]   Representation Learning: A Review and New Perspectives [J].
Bengio, Yoshua ;
Courville, Aaron ;
Vincent, Pascal .
IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON PATTERN ANALYSIS AND MACHINE INTELLIGENCE, 2013, 35 (08) :1798-1828
[7]   Learning Deep Architectures for AI [J].
Bengio, Yoshua .
FOUNDATIONS AND TRENDS IN MACHINE LEARNING, 2009, 2 (01) :1-127
[8]  
Billet F, 2009, LECT NOTES COMPUT SC, V5528, P376, DOI 10.1007/978-3-642-01932-6_41
[9]   STATISTICAL METHODS FOR ASSESSING AGREEMENT BETWEEN TWO METHODS OF CLINICAL MEASUREMENT [J].
BLAND, JM ;
ALTMAN, DG .
LANCET, 1986, 1 (8476) :307-310
[10]  
Boureau Y, 2010, P 27 INT C MACH LEAR, P111, DOI DOI 10.5555/3104322.3104338