Evaluation of the efficacy of laparoscopic resection for the management of exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy

被引:164
作者
Wang, Guangwei [1 ]
Liu, Xiaofei [2 ]
Bi, Fangfang [1 ]
Yin, Lili [1 ]
Sa, Rina [1 ]
Wang, Dandan [1 ]
Yang, Qing [1 ]
机构
[1] China Med Univ, Shengjing Hosp, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Shenyang 110004, Peoples R China
[2] Shenyang Womens & Childrens Hosp, Shenyang, Peoples R China
关键词
Exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy; hysteroscopy; laparoscopy; ECTOPIC PREGNANCY; SECTION SCAR; DIAGNOSIS; ISTHMOCELE; REPAIR; WOMEN;
D O I
10.1016/j.fertnstert.2014.01.045
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
Objective: To retrospectively analyze the clinical data of 71 patients with exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy (CSP) treated in our hospital in the past 2 years, to compare the outcomes of exogenous CSP treated with different methods, and to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic resection of exogenous CSP. Design: Comparative observational study. Setting: Tertiary medical centers. Patient(s): 71 women with exogenous cesarean scar pregnancy. Intervention(s): Hysteroscopic resection of CSP, and laparoscopic resection of CSP. Main Outcome Measure(s): Operation time, intraoperative blood loss, postoperative drainage of the uterine cavity, postoperative days in hospital, time for beta-human chorionic gonadotropin (beta-hCG) to return to normal levels, absorption time of the mass. Result(s): For the laparoscopic group, the time for serum beta-hCG to return normal levels and the postoperative drainage of the uterine cavity were significantly lower than in the patients who had undergone hysteroscopic resection. We found no statistically significant difference in the intraoperative blood loss and postoperative days in hospital between the two groups, but the operation time was longer in laparoscopic group. Conclusion(s): Laparoscopic surgery for a cesarean scar pregnancy has the advantages of a high success rate, fewer complications, and a shorter time for beta-hCG levels to normalize. This procedure is especially suitable for the treatment of exogenous CSP. (C) 2014 by American Society for Reproductive Medicine.
引用
收藏
页码:1501 / 1507
页数:7
相关论文
共 28 条
[1]
Caesarean scar pregnancy [J].
Ash, A. ;
Smith, A. ;
Maxwell, D. .
BJOG-AN INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 2007, 114 (03) :253-263
[2]
Conservative Management of Cesarean Scar Pregnancy With Sonographically Guided Transvaginal Methotrexate Injection [J].
Brasic, Natasha ;
Warden, Meredith ;
Vargas, Juan E. .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2013, 32 (06) :1061-1063
[3]
Colomé C, 2009, CLIN EXP OBSTET GYN, V36, P126
[4]
Laparoscopic repair of wide and deep uterine scar dehiscence after cesarean section [J].
Donnez, Olivier ;
Jadoul, Pascale ;
Squifflet, Jean ;
Donnez, Jacques .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 2008, 89 (04) :974-980
[5]
Uterine artery embolization with methotrexate infusion as treatment for cesarean scar pregnancy. Case report [J].
Elito Junior, Julio ;
Araujo Junior, Edward ;
Martins Santana, Eduardo Felix ;
Szejnfeld, Denis ;
Helfer, Talita Micheletti ;
Machado Nardozza, Luciano Marcondes ;
Moron, Antonio Fernandes .
MEDICAL ULTRASONOGRAPHY, 2013, 15 (03) :240-243
[6]
Surgical treatment and follow-up of women with intermenstrual bleeding due to Cesarean section scar defect [J].
Fabres, C ;
Arriagada, P ;
Fernández, C ;
MacKenna, A ;
Zegers, F ;
Fernández, E .
JOURNAL OF MINIMALLY INVASIVE GYNECOLOGY, 2005, 12 (01) :25-28
[7]
The cesarean delivery scar pouch -: Clinical implications and diagnostic correlation between transvaginal sonography and hysteroscopy [J].
Fabres, C ;
Aviles, G ;
De la Jara, C ;
Escalona, J ;
Muñoz, JF ;
Mackenna, A ;
Fernández, C ;
Zegers-Hochschild, F ;
Fernández, E .
JOURNAL OF ULTRASOUND IN MEDICINE, 2003, 22 (07) :695-700
[8]
Ectopic pregnancy within a cesarean scar: A review. [J].
Fylstra, DL .
OBSTETRICAL & GYNECOLOGICAL SURVEY, 2002, 57 (08) :537-543
[9]
Gasim T, 2013, J REPROD MED, V58, P312
[10]
An ectopic pregnancy developing in a previous caesarian section scar [J].
Godin, PA ;
Bassil, S ;
Donnez, J .
FERTILITY AND STERILITY, 1997, 67 (02) :398-400