The mere-measurement effect: Why does measuring intentions change actual behavior?

被引:192
作者
Morwitz, VG
Fitzsimons, GJ
机构
[1] NYU, Leonard N Stern Sch Business, New York, NY 10012 USA
[2] Duke Univ, Fuqua Sch Business, Durham, NC 27706 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1207/s15327663jcp1401&2_8
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
Recent research has demonstrated that merely measuring an individual's purchase intentions changes his or her subsequent behavior in the market. Several different alternative explanations have been proposed to explain why this "mere-measurement effect" occurs. However, these explanations have not been tested to date. The purpose of this article is to test several competing explanations for why measuring general intentions to purchase (e.g., How likely are you to buy a car?) changes specific brand-level behavior (e.g., which specific brand of car is purchased). The results provide a clearer understanding of the cognitive mechanism through which the mere-measurement effect operates. The results show that when asked to provide general intentions to select a product in a given category, respondents are more likely to choose options toward which they hold positive and accessible attitudes, and are less likely to choose options for which they hold negative and accessible attitudes, compared to a control group of participants who are not asked a general intentions question. These results provide support for the conjecture that asking a general purchase intent question influences behavior by changing the accessibility of attitudes toward specific options in the category.
引用
收藏
页码:64 / 74
页数:11
相关论文
共 25 条
[1]  
Alba J.W., 1991, Handbook of Consumer Behavior, P1, DOI DOI 10.4324/9780203809570.CH3
[2]   INFORMATION ACCESSIBILITY AS A MODERATOR OF CONSUMER CHOICE [J].
BIEHAL, G ;
CHAKRAVARTI, D .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 1983, 10 (01) :1-14
[3]   DRIVE AND PREDISPOSITION AS FACTORS IN ATTITUDINAL EFFECTS OF MERE EXPOSURE [J].
BRICKMAN, P ;
REDFIELD, J ;
CRANDALL, R ;
HARRISON, AA .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1972, 8 (01) :31-&
[4]   Measuring intent: There's nothing "mere" about mere measurement effects [J].
Chapman, KJ .
PSYCHOLOGY & MARKETING, 2001, 18 (08) :811-841
[5]   The scope and persistence of mere-measurement effects: Evidence from a field study of customer satisfaction measurement [J].
Dholakia, UM ;
Morwitz, VG .
JOURNAL OF CONSUMER RESEARCH, 2002, 29 (02) :159-167
[6]   EFFECTS OF REPEATED EXPRESSIONS ON ATTITUDE EXTREMITY [J].
DOWNING, JW ;
JUDD, CM ;
BRAUER, M .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1992, 63 (01) :17-29
[7]  
Fazio R.H., 1981, ADV EXPT SOCIAL PSYC, V14, P161, DOI [10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X, DOI 10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X, https://doi.org/10.1016/S0065-2601(08)60372-X]
[8]   ON THE AUTOMATIC ACTIVATION OF ATTITUDES [J].
FAZIO, RH ;
SANBONMATSU, DM ;
POWELL, MC ;
KARDES, FR .
JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1986, 50 (02) :229-238
[9]   ATTITUDE ACCESSIBILITY, ATTITUDE BEHAVIOR CONSISTENCY, AND THE STRENGTH OF THE OBJECT EVALUATION ASSOCIATION [J].
FAZIO, RH ;
CHEN, J ;
MCDONEL, EC ;
SHERMAN, SJ .
JOURNAL OF EXPERIMENTAL SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1982, 18 (04) :339-357
[10]   SELF-GENERATED VALIDITY AND OTHER EFFECTS OF MEASUREMENT ON BELIEF, ATTITUDE, INTENTION, AND BEHAVIOR [J].
FELDMAN, JM ;
LYNCH, JG .
JOURNAL OF APPLIED PSYCHOLOGY, 1988, 73 (03) :421-435