Tracking sediment redistribution in a small watershed: Implications for agro-landscape evolution

被引:33
作者
Polyakov, VO
Nearing, MA [1 ]
Shipitalo, MJ
机构
[1] USDA, ARS, SW Watershed Res Ctr, Tucson, AZ 85719 USA
[2] Purdue Univ, USDA ARS, Natl Soil Eros Res Lab, W Lafayette, IN USA
[3] USDA ARS, N Appalachian Expt Watershed, Coshocton, OH USA
关键词
catchments; rare earth elements; run-off; sediment delivery ratio; sediment transport; soil erosion; spatial distribution of erosion; tillage erosion; tracers; watersheds;
D O I
10.1002/esp.1094
中图分类号
P9 [自然地理学];
学科分类号
0705 ; 070501 ;
摘要
A new, multi-tracer method is used to track erosion, translocation, and redeposition of sediment in a small watershed, thus allowing for the first time a complete, spatially distributed, sediment balance to be made as a function of landscape position. A 0(.)68 ha watershed near Coshocton, Ohio, USA was divided into six morphological units, each tagged with one of six rare earth element oxides. Sediment translocation was evaluated by collecting run-off and by spatially sampling the soil surface. Average measured erosion rate was 6(.)1 t ha(-1), but varied between 40.4 t ha(-1) loss from the lower channels to 24.1 t ha(-1) gain on the toeslope. With this technique it was possible for the first time to itemize the sediment budget for landscape elements into three components: (1) the soil from the element that left the watershed with run-off; (2) soil from the element that was redeposited on lower positions, with the spatial distribution of that deposition; and (3) soil originating from the upper positions and deposited on the element, with quantification of relative source areas. The results are incongruous with the current morphology of the watershed, suggesting that diffusion-type erosion must also play a major role in defining the evolution of this landscape. Copyright (C) 2004 John Wiley Sons, Ltd.
引用
收藏
页码:1275 / 1291
页数:17
相关论文
共 44 条
[1]  
BRAKENSIEK LD, 1979, AGR HDB USSDA, V224
[2]   AGRICULTURAL EROSION INDICATED BY CS-137 REDISTRIBUTION .2. ESTIMATES OF EROSION RATES [J].
BROWN, RB ;
KLING, GF ;
CUTSHALL, NH .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1981, 45 (06) :1191-1197
[3]   SOIL-EROSION CLASS AND LANDSCAPE POSITION IN THE NORTH-CAROLINA PIEDMONT [J].
DANIELS, RB ;
GILLIAM, JW ;
CASSEL, DK ;
NELSON, LA .
SOIL SCIENCE SOCIETY OF AMERICA JOURNAL, 1985, 49 (04) :991-995
[4]  
DAVIS WM, 1899, GEOGR J, V14, P478
[5]  
Ferro V, 1998, HYDROL PROCESS, V12, P701, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1099-1085(19980430)12:5<701::AID-HYP631>3.0.CO
[6]  
2-L
[7]  
*GAMM DES SOFTW, 2000, GS GEOST ENV SCI US
[8]  
Govers G, 1996, EARTH SURF PROC LAND, V21, P929, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1096-9837(199610)21:10&lt
[9]  
929::AID-ESP631&gt
[10]  
3.0.CO