Is stabilization of disease a useful indicator for survival in second-line treatment of ovarian carcinoma pre-treated with Paclitaxel-Platinum?

被引:12
作者
Gronlund, B
Hogdall, C
Christensen, IJ
Engelholm, SA
Hansen, HH
机构
[1] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Oncol, Finsen Ctr, Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[2] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Dept Gynecol, Juliane Marie Ctr, Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
[3] Copenhagen Univ Hosp, Finsen Ctr, Finsen Lab, Rigshosp, DK-2100 Copenhagen, Denmark
关键词
ovarian cancer; recurrence; chemotherapy; response; stable disease; survival; prognostic factors;
D O I
10.1016/j.ygyno.2004.05.005
中图分类号
R73 [肿瘤学];
学科分类号
100214 [肿瘤学];
摘要
Objective. Recurrent ovarian carcinoma is considered an incurable disease and second-line chemotherapy is administered for extension of survival and palliation. The impact of continued antineoplastic treatment in patients with stable disease without a demonstrable response is uncertain. The aim of this analysis was to assess the value of a stabilization of the tumor size in second-line chemotherapy as an indicator of survival. Methods. Retrospective, single-institution study of 487 consecutive patients with primary epithelial ovarian carcinoma. Inclusion criteria: (1) FIGO stage IC-IV epithelial ovarian carcinoma; (2) first-line chemotherapy with Paclitaxel and a Platinum-compound; (3) refractory, persistent, or recurrent disease diagnosed by imaging methods; and (4) intravenous second-line chemotherapy with single Topotecan or Paclitaxel-Carboplatin. Univariate and multivariate analyses of survival with the World Health Organization (WHO) tumor response parameter included as a time-dependent variable were performed. Results. The response rates were (N = 100): complete response (CR) 27%, partial response (PR) 14%, stable disease (SD) 41% and progressive disease (PD) 18%. In a multivariate Cox regression analysis of survival, SD was found to be an independent prognostic factor for survival and the death hazard ratio was 0.37 (SD versus PD; 95% Cl: 0.16-0.86; P = 0.02). There was no statistically significant difference in survival between patients with PR and SD (P = 0.09). Conclusion. In second-line chemotherapy of ovarian cancer, patients demonstrating SD have a survival benefit compared to patients with PD measured by the WHO tumor response criteria. (C) 2004 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:409 / 415
页数:7
相关论文
共 31 条
[1]
ANALYSIS OF SURVIVAL BY TUMOR RESPONSE [J].
ANDERSON, JR ;
CAIN, KC ;
GELBER, RD .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1983, 1 (11) :710-719
[2]
ARMITAGE JO, 1993, NEW ENGL J MED, V328, P1023
[3]
Advanced epithelial ovarian cancer:: 1998 consensus statements [J].
Berek, JS ;
Bertelsen, K ;
du Bois, A ;
Brady, MF ;
Carmichael, J ;
Eisenhauer, EA ;
Gore, M ;
Grenman, S ;
Hamilton, TC ;
Hansen, SW ;
Harper, PG ;
Horvath, G ;
Kaye, SB ;
Lück, HJ ;
Lund, B ;
McGuire, WP ;
Neijt, JP ;
Ozols, RF ;
Parmar, MKB ;
Piccart-Gebhart, MJ ;
van Rijswijk, R ;
Rosenberg, P ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Sessa, C ;
Thigpen, JT ;
Tropé, C ;
Tuxen, MK ;
Vergote, I ;
Vermorken, JB ;
Willemse, PHB .
ANNALS OF ONCOLOGY, 1999, 10 :87-92
[4]
Comparison of standard and CA-125 response criteria in patients with epithelial ovarian cancer treated with platinum or paclitaxel [J].
Bridgewater, JA ;
Nelstrop, AE ;
Rustin, GJS ;
Gore, ME ;
McGuire, WP ;
Hoskins, WJ .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY, 1999, 17 (02) :501-508
[5]
Relation between tumour response to first-line chemotherapy and survival in advanced colorectal cancer: a meta-analysis [J].
Buyse, M ;
Thirion, P ;
Carlson, RW ;
Burzykowski, T ;
Molenberghs, G ;
Piedbois, P .
LANCET, 2000, 356 (9227) :373-378
[6]
Buyse M, 1996, STAT MED, V15, P2797, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0258(19961230)15:24<2797::AID-SIM290>3.0.CO
[7]
2-V
[8]
Cesano A, 1999, INT J ONCOL, V15, P1233
[9]
A model to select chemotherapy regimens for phase III trials for extensive-stage small-cell lung cancer [J].
Chen, TT ;
Chute, JP ;
Feigal, E ;
Johnson, BE ;
Simon, R .
JNCI-JOURNAL OF THE NATIONAL CANCER INSTITUTE, 2000, 92 (19) :1601-1607
[10]
Davelaar EM, 1996, CANCER, V78, P118, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19960701)78:1<118::AID-CNCR17>3.0.CO