Live vaccine strain Francisella tularensis is detectable at the inoculation site but not in blood after vaccination against Tularemia

被引:18
作者
Hepburn, Matthew J.
Purcell, Bret K.
Lawler, James V.
Coyne, Susan R.
Petitt, Patricia L.
Sellers, Karen D.
Norwood, David A.
Ulrich, Melanie P.
机构
[1] USA, Med Res Inst Infect Dis, Div Med, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA
[2] USA, Med Res Inst Infect Dis, Div Bacteriol, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA
[3] USA, Med Res Inst Infect Dis, Div Diagnost Syst, Ft Detrick, MD 21702 USA
关键词
D O I
10.1086/506348
中图分类号
R392 [医学免疫学]; Q939.91 [免疫学];
学科分类号
100102 ;
摘要
Introduction. Live vaccine strain ( LVS) Francisella tularensis is a live, attenuated investigational tularemia vaccine that has been used by the US Army for decades to protect laboratory workers. Postvaccination bacterial kinetic characteristics of LVS at the inoculation site and in the blood are unknown and, therefore, were assessed in a prospective study. LVS vaccination of laboratory workers provided the opportunity to compare culture with polymerase chain reaction ( PCR) for the detection of F. tularensis in human clinical samples. Methods. Blood and skin swab samples were prospectively collected from volunteers who received the LVS tularemia vaccine at baseline ( negative controls) and at 5 specified time points ( days 1, 2, 7 or 8, 14 or 15, and 35 after vaccination). Bacterial culture and PCR of whole blood samples ( 17 volunteers) and inoculation site swabs ( 41 volunteers) were performed. Results. The culture and PCR results of all blood samples were negative. Results of real-time PCR from the inoculation site samples were positive for 41 ( 100%) of 41 volunteers on day 1, for 40 ( 97.6%) of 41 volunteers on day 2, for 24 ( 58.5%) of 41 on day 7 or 8, for 6 ( 16.7%) of 36 on day 14 or 15, and for 0 ( 0%) of 9 on day 35. Positive results of bacterial cultures of the inoculation site samples occurred significantly less frequently, compared with PCR testing, with 4 ( 9.8%) of 41 volunteers having positive results on day 1 (P < .001) and 4 ( 9.8%) of 41 on day 2 (P < .001); all results from subsequent days were negative. Conclusions. F. tularensis LVS genomic DNA was detected in the majority of samples from the inoculation site up to 1 week after LVS vaccination, with real-time PCR being more sensitive than culture. Our data suggest that bacteremia does not occur after LVS vaccination in normal, healthy human volunteers.
引用
收藏
页码:711 / 716
页数:6
相关论文
共 18 条
[1]   IMMUNIZATION AGAINST TULAREMIA - ANALYSIS OF EFFECTIVENESS OF LIVE FRANCISELLA-TULARENSIS VACCINE IN PREVENTION OF LABORATORY-ACQUIRED TULAREMIA [J].
BURKE, DS .
JOURNAL OF INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1977, 135 (01) :55-60
[2]   Detection of biological threat agents by real-time PCR: Comparison of assay performance on the RAPID, the LightCycler, and the smart cycler platforms [J].
Christensen, DR ;
Hartman, LJ ;
Loveless, BM ;
Frye, MS ;
Shipley, MA ;
Bridge, DL ;
Richards, MJ ;
Kaplan, RS ;
Garrison, J ;
Baldwin, CD ;
Kulesh, DA ;
Norwood, DA .
CLINICAL CHEMISTRY, 2006, 52 (01) :141-145
[3]   Tularemia as a biological weapon - Medical and public health management [J].
Dennis, DT ;
Inglesby, TV ;
Henderson, DA ;
Bartlett, JG ;
Ascher, MS ;
Eitzen, E ;
Fine, AD ;
Friedlander, AM ;
Hauer, J ;
Layton, M ;
Lillibridge, SR ;
McDade, JE ;
Osterholm, MT ;
O'Toole, T ;
Parker, G ;
Perl, TM ;
Russell, PK ;
Tonat, K .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 2001, 285 (21) :2763-2773
[4]   Detection of Francisella tularensis in clinical specimens by use of polymerase chain reaction [J].
Dolan, SA ;
Dommaraju, CB ;
DeGuzman, GB .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 1998, 26 (03) :764-765
[5]   Tularemia [J].
Ellis, J ;
Oyston, PCF ;
Green, M ;
Titball, RW .
CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY REVIEWS, 2002, 15 (04) :631-+
[6]   Detection of Francisella tularensis within infected mouse tissues by using a hand-held PCR thermocycler [J].
Emanuel, PA ;
Bell, R ;
Dang, JL ;
McClanahan, R ;
David, JC ;
Burgess, RJ ;
Thompson, J ;
Collins, L ;
Hadfield, T .
JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY, 2003, 41 (02) :689-693
[7]   A rapid, highly sensitive method for the detection of Francisella tularensis in clinical samples using the polymerase chain reaction [J].
Fulop, M ;
Leslie, D ;
Titball, R .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 1996, 54 (04) :364-366
[8]   Detection of Francisella tularensis in biological specimens using a capture enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay, an immunochromatographic handheld assay, and a PCR [J].
Grunow, R ;
Splettstoesser, W ;
McDonald, S ;
Otterbein, C ;
O'Brien, T ;
Morgan, C ;
Aldrich, J ;
Hofer, E ;
Finke, EJ ;
Meyer, H .
CLINICAL AND DIAGNOSTIC LABORATORY IMMUNOLOGY, 2000, 7 (01) :86-90
[9]   Development of a novel internal positive control for Taqman® based assays [J].
Hartman, LJ ;
Coyne, SR ;
Norwood, DA .
MOLECULAR AND CELLULAR PROBES, 2005, 19 (01) :51-59
[10]   Detection of Francisella tularensis in infected mammals and vectors using a probe-based polymerase chain reaction [J].
Higgins, JA ;
Hubalek, Z ;
Halouzka, J ;
Elkins, KL ;
Sjostedt, A ;
Shipley, M ;
Ibrahim, MS .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF TROPICAL MEDICINE AND HYGIENE, 2000, 62 (02) :310-318