Muscle size, strength, and bone geometry in the upper limbs of young and old men

被引:40
作者
Klein, CS
Allman, BL
Marsh, GD
Rice, CL
机构
[1] St Josephs Hlth Ctr Annex, Canadian Ctr Act & Aging, London, ON N6G 2M3, Canada
[2] Univ Western Ontario, Div Imaging, Lawson Hlth Res Inst, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[3] Univ Western Ontario, Sch Kinesiol, Fac Hlth Sci, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[4] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Anat & Cell Biol, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
[5] Univ Western Ontario, Dept Med Biophys, Fac Med & Dent, London, ON N6A 3K7, Canada
来源
JOURNALS OF GERONTOLOGY SERIES A-BIOLOGICAL SCIENCES AND MEDICAL SCIENCES | 2002年 / 57卷 / 07期
关键词
D O I
10.1093/gerona/57.7.M455
中图分类号
R592 [老年病学]; C [社会科学总论];
学科分类号
03 [法学]; 0303 [社会学]; 100203 [老年医学];
摘要
Background. Bone loss in old men is associated with a decrease in muscle mass and strength. However, the influence of muscle size and strength on age-related changes in bone geometry has not been comprehensively described. Methods. Men in their third (group I, 23 +/- 3 y, n = 20), eighth (group II, 77 +/- 1 y, n = 10), and ninth (group III, 86 +/- 4 y, n = 13) decades of age were studied. The cross-sectional area (CSA) of the elbow flexors, elbow extensors, and forearm muscles, the total area (TA), cortical area (CA), and medullary area (MA) of the midhumerus, and distal third of the radius and ulna (n = 7 group II; n = 6 group III) were measured with magnetic resonance imaging. The maximal isometric strength (MVC) of the elbow flexors and elbow extensors was also determined. Results. The CSA and MVC of the arm muscles (elbow flexors plus elbow extensors) were less in group II (- 17% and -22%) and III (-32% and -39%), respectively, compared to group I. However, forearm CSA was less (-21 %) in group III only. The TA and MA of all bones were greater in the older groups. The CA of the humerus (- 14%) and ulna (-10%), but not the radius, was less in group III compared to group I, whereas CA was unchanged in group II. Stepwise multiple linear regression determined that arm muscle CSA (r = 0.52, p < .01) and forearm muscle CSA (r = 0.41, p < .05) provided the best prediction of CA in the humerus and forearm. respectively. Conclusions. Muscle size and strength are important determinants of CA in the humerus and forearm. The lower CA in the ninth decade may be explained, in part, by reduced bone strains due to a smaller muscle mass.
引用
收藏
页码:M455 / M459
页数:5
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]
Associations of fat and muscle masses with bone mineral in elderly men and women [J].
Baumgartner, RN ;
Stauber, PM ;
Koehler, KM ;
Romero, L ;
Garry, PJ .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NUTRITION, 1996, 63 (03) :365-372
[2]
CT of the middiaphyseal femur: Cortical bone mineral density and relation to porosity [J].
Bousson, V ;
Bergot, C ;
Meunier, A ;
Barbot, F ;
Parlier-Cuau, C ;
Laval-Jeantet, AM ;
Laredo, JD .
RADIOLOGY, 2000, 217 (01) :179-187
[3]
Muscle strength, bone mass, and age-related bone loss [J].
Burr, DB .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (10) :1547-1551
[4]
THE EFFECTS OF COMPOSITION, STRUCTURE AND AGE ON THE TORSIONAL PROPERTIES OF THE HUMAN RADIUS [J].
BURR, DB ;
MARTIN, RB .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 1983, 16 (08) :603-608
[5]
On our age-related bone loss: Insights from a new paradigm [J].
Frost, HM .
JOURNAL OF BONE AND MINERAL RESEARCH, 1997, 12 (10) :1539-1546
[6]
CONTINUING BONE EXPANSION AND INCREASING BONE LOSS OVER A 2-DECADE PERIOD IN MEN AND WOMEN FROM A TOTAL COMMUNITY SAMPLE [J].
GARN, SM ;
SULLIVAN, TV ;
DECKER, SA ;
LARKIN, FA ;
HAWTHORNE, VM .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF HUMAN BIOLOGY, 1992, 4 (01) :57-67
[7]
GARN SM, 1967, FED PROC, V26, P1729
[8]
GARN SM, 1970, EARLIER GAIN LATER L, P77
[9]
The First International Conference on Osteoporosis in Men - Siena, Italy, February 23-25, 2001 [J].
Gennari, C ;
Seeman, E .
CALCIFIED TISSUE INTERNATIONAL, 2001, 69 (04) :177-178
[10]
Age, sex, and grip strength determine architectural bone parameters assessed by peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) at the human radius [J].
Hasegawa, Y ;
Schneider, P ;
Reiners, C .
JOURNAL OF BIOMECHANICS, 2001, 34 (04) :497-503