What matters to the parents? A qualitative study of parents' experiences with life-and-death decisions concerning their premature infants

被引:112
作者
Brinchmann, BS [1 ]
Forde, R [1 ]
Nortvedt, P [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
关键词
critically ill premature infants; ethics of KE Logstrup; life-and-death; parents' decision making; Norway;
D O I
10.1191/0969733002ne523oa
中图分类号
B82 [伦理学(道德学)];
学科分类号
摘要
The aim of this article is to generate knowledge about parents' participation in life-and-death decisions concerning their very premature and/or critically ill infants in hospital neonatal units. The question is: what are parents' attitudes towards their involvement in such decision making? A descriptive study design using in-depth interviews was chosen. During the period 1997-2000, 20 qualitative interviews with 35 parents of 26 children were carried out. Ten of the infants died; 16 were alive at the time of the interview. The comparative method (grounded theory) was used to analyse the data. The analysis was carried out continuously and in parallel with data collection. Six categories were revealed by the analysis: indecision and uncertainty (ambivalence); information and communication; participate, but do not decide; seeming to be included; the parents' child; and individual consideration. The findings appear to indicate that parents agree that they should not have the final word in decisions concerning their infants' future life or death. Such a responsibility would put too heavy a burden on parents who lack the medical knowledge and the professional experience needed to make such a decision, and would be likely to lead to them experiencing strong feelings of guilt. The findings show that parents should be well informed and listened to during the whole decision-making process. Their primary concern was how nurses and physicians communicate with parents who are experiencing a crisis, and how this serious information is presented.
引用
收藏
页码:388 / 404
页数:17
相关论文
共 41 条
[1]  
Anspach RR., 1993, DECIDING WHO LIVES F
[2]  
Bauman Z., 1993, POSTMODERN ETHICS
[3]   Patients' preferences for participation in clinical decision making: A review of published surveys [J].
Benbassat, J ;
Pilpel, D ;
Tidhar, M .
BEHAVIORAL MEDICINE, 1998, 24 (02) :81-88
[4]   BE HONEST BUT NOT CRUEL - STAFF PARENT COMMUNICATION ON A NEONATAL UNIT [J].
BOGDAN, R ;
BROWN, MA ;
FOSTER, SB .
HUMAN ORGANIZATION, 1982, 41 (01) :6-16
[5]   Ethical decision making in neonatal units--the normative significance of vitality. [J].
Brinchmann B.S. ;
Nortvedt P. .
Medicine, Health Care and Philosophy, 2001, 4 (2) :193-200
[6]  
Brinchmann Berit Store, 1999, Tidsskrift for den Norske Laegeforening, V119, P2993
[7]  
Brinchmann BS, 2001, J CLIN ETHIC, V12, P307
[8]   When the home becomes a prison: Living with a severely disabled child [J].
Brinchmann, BS .
NURSING ETHICS, 1999, 6 (02) :137-143
[9]   'They have to show that they can make it': Vitality as a criterion for the prognosis of premature infants [J].
Brinchmann, BS .
NURSING ETHICS, 2000, 7 (02) :141-147
[10]  
BRINCHMANN BS, 1999, IMAGE, V31, P276