A multicenter evaluation of remifentanil for early postoperative analgesia

被引:109
作者
Bowdle, TA
Camporesi, EM
Maysick, L
Hogue, CW
Miguel, RV
Pitts, M
Streisand, JB
机构
[1] UNIV WASHINGTON,DEPT PHARMACEUT,SEATTLE,WA 98195
[2] SUNY SYRACUSE,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,SYRACUSE,NY
[3] MONTEFIORE MED CTR,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,NEW YORK,NY
[4] WASHINGTON UNIV,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,ST LOUIS,MO
[5] UNIV S FLORIDA,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,TAMPA,FL 33612
[6] EMORY UNIV,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,ATLANTA,GA 30322
[7] UNIV UTAH,DEPT ANESTHESIOL,SALT LAKE CITY,UT
关键词
D O I
10.1097/00000539-199612000-00028
中图分类号
R614 [麻醉学];
学科分类号
100217 ;
摘要
We evaluated the use of an infusion of remifentanil to provide postoperative analgesia during recovery from total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) with remifentanil and propofol. One hundred fifty-seven patients from seven medical centers underwent abdominal, spine, joint replacement, or thoracic surgery. Remifentanil was titrated in an effort to limit pain to 0 or 1 on a 0-3 scale. At the end of the 30-min titration period, 78% of infusion rates were in the range of 0.05 to less than or equal to 0.15 mu g . kg(-1) . min(-1), 5% were <0.05 mu g . kg(-1) min(-1), and 17% were >0.15 mu g . kg(-1) . min(-1). Pain scores were 0 or 1 in 64% of patients. Nausea occurred in 35% and emesis in 8% of patients; the peak incidence of nausea followed discontinuation of the remifentanil infusion at the time of administering morphine. Respiratory adverse events (oxygen saturation by pulse oximetry [Spo(2)] <90% or respiratory rate <12) affected 29% of patients. Apnea occurred in 11 patients (7.0%). There was a large variation in the incidence of respiratory depression between the centers, ranging from 0 to 75%. The explanation for the large variability in respiratory outcome was not evident.
引用
收藏
页码:1292 / 1297
页数:6
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]  
ALDRETE JA, 1970, ANESTH ANAL CURR RES, V49, P924
[2]  
BORGEAT A, 1992, ANESTH ANALG, V74, P539
[3]   THE PHARMACOKINETICS OF THE NEW SHORT-ACTING OPIOID REMIFENTANIL (GI87084B) IN HEALTHY ADULT MALE-VOLUNTEERS [J].
EGAN, TD ;
LEMMENS, HJM ;
FISET, P ;
HERMANN, DJ ;
MUIR, KT ;
STANSKI, DR ;
SHAFER, SL .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (05) :881-892
[4]  
GLASS PSA, 1993, ANESTH ANALG, V77, P1031
[5]   A multicenter evaluation of total intravenous anesthesia with remifentanil and propofol for elective inpatient surgery [J].
Hogue, CW ;
Bowdle, TA ;
OLeary, C ;
Duncalf, D ;
Miguel, R ;
Pitts, M ;
Streisand, J ;
Kirvassilis, G ;
Jamerson, B ;
McNeal, S ;
Batenhorst, R .
ANESTHESIA AND ANALGESIA, 1996, 83 (02) :279-285
[6]   RANDOMIZED COMPARISON OF RECOVERY AFTER PROPOFOL-NITROUS OXIDE VERSUS THIOPENTONE-ISOFLURANE-NITROUS OXIDE ANESTHESIA IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING AMBULATORY SURGERY [J].
KORTTILA, K ;
OSTMAN, P ;
FAURE, E ;
APFELBAUM, JL ;
PRUNSKIS, J ;
EKDAWI, M ;
ROIZEN, MF .
ACTA ANAESTHESIOLOGICA SCANDINAVICA, 1990, 34 (05) :400-403
[7]   POSTOPERATIVE NAUSEA AND VOMITING - ITS ETIOLOGY, TREATMENT, AND PREVENTION [J].
WATCHA, MF ;
WHITE, PF .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1992, 77 (01) :162-184
[8]   PHARMACOKINETICS OF REMIFENTANIL (GI87084B) AND ITS MAJOR METABOLITE (GI90291) IN PATIENTS UNDERGOING ELECTIVE INPATIENT SURGERY [J].
WESTMORELAND, CL ;
HOKE, JF ;
SEBEL, PS ;
HUG, CC ;
MUIR, KT .
ANESTHESIOLOGY, 1993, 79 (05) :893-903