Human evoked cortical activity to signal-to-noise ratio and absolute signal level

被引:113
作者
Billings, Curtis J. [1 ,2 ]
Tremblay, Kelly L. [2 ]
Stecker, G. Christopher [2 ]
Tolin, Wendy M. [2 ]
机构
[1] Portland VA Med Ctr, Natl Ctr Rehabilitat Auditory Res, Portland, OR 97239 USA
[2] Univ Washington, Dept Speech & Hearing Sci, Seattle, WA 98105 USA
基金
美国国家卫生研究院;
关键词
Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs); Event-related potentials (ERPs); Signals in noise; Signal-to-noise ratio (SNR); N1; Auditory cortex; Hearing aids; SENSORINEURAL HEARING-LOSS; EVENT-RELATED POTENTIALS; BROAD-BAND NOISE; NEURAL REPRESENTATION; AUDITORY-CORTEX; BEHAVIORAL MEASURES; AMPLIFIED SPEECH; RESPONSES; SOUND; INTENSITY;
D O I
10.1016/j.heares.2009.04.002
中图分类号
R36 [病理学]; R76 [耳鼻咽喉科学];
学科分类号
100104 ; 100213 ;
摘要
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of signal level and signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) on the latency and amplitude of evoked cortical activity to further our understanding of how the human central auditory system encodes signals in noise. Cortical auditory evoked potentials (CAEPs) were recorded from 15 young normal-hearing adults in response to a 1000 Hz tone presented at two tone levels in quiet and while continuous background noise levels were varied in five equivalent SNR steps. These 12 conditions were used to determine the effects of signal level and SNR level on CAEP components P1, N1, P2, and N2. Based on prior signal-in-noise experiments conducted in animals, we hypothesized that SNR, would be a key contributor to human CAEP characteristics. As hypothesized, amplitude increased and latency decreased with increasing SNR; in addition, there was no main effect of tone level across the two signal levels tested (60 and 75 dB SPL). Morphology of the P1-N1-P2 complex was driven primarily by SNR, highlighting the importance of noise when recording CAEPs. Results are discussed in terms of the current interest in recording CAEPs in hearing aid users. Published by Elsevier B.V.
引用
收藏
页码:15 / 24
页数:10
相关论文
共 59 条
[1]  
ADLER G, 1989, AUDIOLOGY, V28, P316
[2]   AUDITORY STIMULUS-PROCESSING AT DIFFERENT STIMULUS INTENSITIES AS REFLECTED BY AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS [J].
ADLER, G ;
ADLER, J .
BIOLOGICAL PSYCHIATRY, 1991, 29 (04) :347-356
[3]   DISCRIMINATION OF WIDE-BAND NOISES MODULATED BY A TEMPORALLY ASYMMETRIC FUNCTION [J].
AKEROYD, MA ;
PATTERSON, RD .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1995, 98 (05) :2466-2474
[4]  
Beagley H A, 1967, J Laryngol Otol, V81, P861, DOI 10.1017/S0022215100067815
[5]   Effects of hearing aid amplification and stimulus intensity on cortical auditory evoked Potentials [J].
Billings, Curtis J. ;
Tremblay, Kelly L. ;
Souza, Pamela E. ;
Binns, Malcolm A. .
AUDIOLOGY AND NEURO-OTOLOGY, 2007, 12 (04) :234-246
[6]   FRONTAL AUDITORY EVOKED-POTENTIALS AND AUGMENTING-REDUCING [J].
BRUNEAU, N ;
ROUX, S ;
GARREAU, B ;
LELORD, G .
ELECTROENCEPHALOGRAPHY AND CLINICAL NEUROPHYSIOLOGY, 1985, 62 (05) :364-371
[7]   THE EFFECT OF BROAD-BAND NOISE ON THE HUMAN BRAIN-STEM AUDITORY EVOKED-RESPONSE .1. RATE AND INTENSITY EFFECTS [J].
BURKARD, R ;
HECOX, K .
JOURNAL OF THE ACOUSTICAL SOCIETY OF AMERICA, 1983, 74 (04) :1204-1213
[8]   STIMULUS REPETITION RATE FACTORS WHICH INFLUENCE AUDITORY EVOKED POTENTIAL IN MAN [J].
BUTLER, RA ;
SPRENG, M ;
KEIDEL, WD .
PSYCHOPHYSIOLOGY, 1969, 5 (06) :665-&
[9]  
Caldwell Marc, 2006, Trends Amplif, V10, P145, DOI 10.1177/1084713806292653
[10]   FURTHER VALIDATION OF EVOKED RESPONSE AUDIOMETRY (ERA) [J].
DAVIS, H ;
HIRSH, SK ;
SHELNUTT, J ;
BOWERS, C .
JOURNAL OF SPEECH AND HEARING RESEARCH, 1967, 10 (04) :717-&