Discussing Treatment Preferences With Patients Who Want "Everything"

被引:93
作者
Quill, Timothy E. [1 ]
Arnold, Robert
Back, Anthony L.
机构
[1] Univ Rochester, Med Ctr, Ctr Eth Humanities & Palliat Care, Rochester, NY 14642 USA
关键词
NOT-RESUSCITATE ORDERS; SERIOUSLY ILL PATIENTS; ADVANCED CANCER; CARDIOPULMONARY-RESUSCITATION; PALLIATIVE CARE; LIFE; PHYSICIANS; END; COMMUNICATION; FAMILIES;
D O I
10.7326/0003-4819-151-5-200909010-00010
中图分类号
R5 [内科学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100201 ;
摘要
When asked about setting limits on medical treatment in the face of severe illness, patients and their families often respond that they want "everything." Clinicians should not take this request at face value, but should instead use it as the basis for a broader discussion about what "doing everything" means to the patient. The discussion might include questions about what balances of treatment burden and benefit the patient can tolerate and about emotional, cognitive, spiritual, and family factors that underlie the request. After this initial exploration, the clinician can propose a philosophy of treatment and make recommendations that capture the patient's values and preferences in light of the medical condition. Clinicians should respond to emotional reactions, directly negotiate disagreements, and use harm-reduction strategies for the relatively infrequent instances in which patients continue to request burdensome therapy that is unlikely to help. By using this approach, patients, families, and clinicians will be better able to understand each other and join together to develop a treatment approach that best respects patient and family values in light of what is medically achievable.
引用
收藏
页码:345 / U75
页数:6
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], 1969, On Death and Dying
[2]  
Back A., 2009, Mastering Communication with Seriously Ill Patients
[3]   Communication about cancer near the end of life [J].
Back, Anthony L. ;
Anderson, Wendy G. ;
Bunch, Lynn ;
Marr, Lisa A. ;
Wallace, James A. ;
Yang, Holly B. ;
Arnold, Robert M. .
CANCER, 2008, 113 (07) :1897-1910
[4]   The effect of do-not-resuscitate orders on physician decision-making [J].
Beach, MC ;
Morrison, RS .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN GERIATRICS SOCIETY, 2002, 50 (12) :2057-2061
[5]  
COHENCOLE SA, 2000, MEDICAL INTERVIEW 3
[6]   Practical Guidance for Evidence-Based ICU Family Conferences [J].
Curtis, J. Randall ;
White, Douglas B. .
CHEST, 2008, 134 (04) :835-843
[7]   Rebuttal from Dr. Curtis [J].
Curtis, J. Randall ;
Burt, Robert A. .
CHEST, 2007, 132 (03) :754-755
[8]   Point: The ethics of unilateral "Do not resuscitate" orders: The role of "Informed assent" [J].
Cwrtis, J. Randall ;
Burt, Robert A. .
CHEST, 2007, 132 (03) :748-751
[9]   Ethics roundtable debate: Patients and surrogates want 'everything done' - what does 'everything' mean? [J].
Doig, Christopher ;
Murray, Holt ;
Bellomo, Rinaldo ;
Kuiper, Michael ;
Costa, Rubens ;
Azoulay, Elie ;
Crippen, David .
CRITICAL CARE, 2006, 10 (05)
[10]  
Fisher R., 2011, GETTING YES NEGOTIAT