A comparative review of inorganic aerosol thermodynamic equilibrium modules: similarities, differences, and their likely causes

被引:152
作者
Zhang, Y
Seigneur, C
Seinfeld, JH
Jacobson, M
Clegg, SL
Binkowski, FS
机构
[1] Atmospher & Environm Res Inc, San Ramon, CA 94583 USA
[2] CALTECH, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[3] Stanford Univ, Stanford, CA 94305 USA
[4] Univ E Anglia, Norwich NR4 7TJ, Norfolk, England
[5] US EPA, NOAA, Res Triangle Pk, NC 27711 USA
关键词
inorganic particulate matter; thermodynamic modeling; multi-phase equilibrium; module comparison; sensitivity;
D O I
10.1016/S1352-2310(99)00236-8
中图分类号
X [环境科学、安全科学];
学科分类号
08 ; 0830 ;
摘要
A comprehensive comparison of five inorganic aerosol thermodynamic equilibrium modules, MARS-A, SEQUILIB, SCAPE2, EQUISOLV II, and AIM2 was conducted for a variety of atmospheric concentrations of particulate matter (PM) constituents, relative humidities (RHs), and temperatures. Our results show that although the PM compositions and concentrations predicted by these modules are generally comparable under most conditions, significant discrepancies exist under some conditions, especially at high nitrate/chloride concentrations and low/medium RHs. As a consequence, the absolute differences in total PM concentrations predicted by these modules under all simulation conditions are 7.7-12.3% on average and as much as 68% for specific cases. The PM predictions are highly sensitive to changes in the molar ratios of ammonium to sulfate, nitrate to sulfate, and sodium chloride to sulfate, relative humidity, and temperature. The similarities and differences in simulation results predicted by the five modules are analyzed and the likely causes for these differences are discussed in detail. Recommendations are provided regarding the relative advantages of these modules, possible improvements of their performance, and applications in three-dimensional PM modeling studies. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:117 / 137
页数:21
相关论文
共 35 条
[1]   FIELD-MEASUREMENTS OF THE DISSOCIATION OF AMMONIUM-NITRATE AND AMMONIUM-CHLORIDE AEROSOLS [J].
ALLEN, AG ;
HARRISON, RM ;
ERISMAN, JW .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1989, 23 (07) :1591-1599
[2]   Prediction of multicomponent inorganic atmospheric aerosol behavior [J].
Ansari, AS ;
Pandis, SN .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1999, 33 (05) :745-757
[3]  
ANSARI AS, 1999, IN PRESS AEROSOL SCI
[4]   ATMOSPHERIC EQUILIBRIUM-MODEL OF SULFATE AND NITRATE AEROSOLS [J].
BASSETT, M ;
SEINFELD, JH .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1983, 17 (11) :2237-2252
[5]   ATMOSPHERIC EQUILIBRIUM-MODEL OF SULFATE AND NITRATE AEROSOLS .2. PARTICLE-SIZE ANALYSIS [J].
BASSETT, ME ;
SEINFELD, JH .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT, 1984, 18 (06) :1163-1170
[6]   The Regional Particulate Matter Model .1. Model description and preliminary results [J].
Binkowski, FS ;
Shankar, U .
JOURNAL OF GEOPHYSICAL RESEARCH-ATMOSPHERES, 1995, 100 (D12) :26191-26209
[7]   WATER ACTIVITIES OF NH4NO3/(NH4)2SO4 SOLUTIONS [J].
CHAN, CK ;
FLAGAN, RC ;
SEINFELD, JH .
ATMOSPHERIC ENVIRONMENT PART A-GENERAL TOPICS, 1992, 26 (09) :1661-1673
[8]   Thermodynamic model of the system H+-NH4+-Na+-SO42--NB3--Cl--H2O at 298.15 K [J].
Clegg, SL ;
Brimblecombe, P ;
Wexler, AS .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1998, 102 (12) :2155-2171
[9]   Thermodynamic model of the system H+-NH4+-SO42--NO3--H2O at tropospheric temperatures [J].
Clegg, SL ;
Brimblecombe, P ;
Wexler, AS .
JOURNAL OF PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY A, 1998, 102 (12) :2137-2154
[10]  
CLEGG SL, 1994, J PHYS CHEM-US, V98, P1368