A first comparison of the surface brightness fluctuation survey distances with the galaxy density field:: Implications for H0 and Ω

被引:29
作者
Blakeslee, JP
Davis, M
Tonry, JL
Dressler, A
Ajhar, EA
机构
[1] CALTECH, Dept Astron, Pasadena, CA 91125 USA
[2] Univ Durham, Dept Phys, Durham DH1 3LE, England
[3] Univ Calif Berkeley, Dept Astron, Berkeley, CA 94720 USA
[4] Univ Hawaii, Inst Astron, Honolulu, HI 96822 USA
[5] Carnegie Obserb, Pasadena, CA 91101 USA
[6] Natl Opt Astron Observ, Kitt Peak Natl Observ, Tucson, AZ 85726 USA
基金
美国国家科学基金会;
关键词
cosmology : observations; distance scale; galaxies : distances and redshifts; large-scale structure of universe;
D O I
10.1086/312404
中图分类号
P1 [天文学];
学科分类号
0704 ;
摘要
We compare the peculiar velocities measured in the surface brightness fluctuation survey of galaxy distances with the predictions from the density fields of the IRAS 1.2 Jy flux-limited redshift survey and the optical redshift survey (ORS) to derive simultaneous constraints on the Hubble constant H-0 and the density parameter beta = Omega(0.6)/b, where b is the linear bias. We find that beta(1) = 0.42(-0.06)(+0.10) and beta(0) = 0.26 +/- 0.08 for the IRAS and ORS comparisons, respectively, and that H-0 = 74 +/- 4 km s(-1) Mpc (with an additional 9% uncertainty due to the Cepheids themselves). The match between predicted and observed peculiar velocities is good for these values of H-0 and beta, and although there is covariance between the two parameters, our results clearly point toward low-density cosmologies. Thus, the unresolved discrepancy between the "velocity-velocity'' and "density-density" measurements of beta continues.
引用
收藏
页码:L73 / L76
页数:4
相关论文
共 26 条
[1]   The velocity field predicted by the Optical Redshift Survey [J].
Baker, JE ;
Davis, M ;
Strauss, MA ;
Lahav, O ;
Santiago, BX .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 508 (01) :6-16
[2]  
Blakeslee JP, 1999, ASTROPHYS SPACE SC L, V237, P181
[3]   Comparison of the SFI peculiar velocities with the IRAS 1.2-Jy gravity field [J].
da Costa, LN ;
Nusser, A ;
Freudling, W ;
Giovanelli, R ;
Haynes, MP ;
Salzer, JJ ;
Wegner, G .
MONTHLY NOTICES OF THE ROYAL ASTRONOMICAL SOCIETY, 1998, 299 (02) :425-432
[4]   Comparison of velocity and gravity fields: The Mark III Tully-Fisher catalog versus the IRAS 1.2 Jy survey [J].
Davis, M ;
Nusser, A ;
Willick, JA .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 473 (01) :22-41
[5]   POTENTIAL, VELOCITY, AND DENSITY FIELDS FROM SPARSE AND NOISY REDSHIFT-DISTANCE SAMPLES - METHOD [J].
DEKEL, A ;
BERTSCHINGER, E ;
FABER, SM .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1990, 364 (02) :349-369
[6]   The observational distribution of internal velocity dispersions in nearby galaxy clusters [J].
Fadda, D ;
Girardi, M ;
Giuricin, G ;
Mardirossian, F ;
Mezzetti, M .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1996, 473 (02) :670-686
[7]  
FERRARESE L, 1999, IN PRESS APJ
[8]   THE IRAS 1.2 JY SURVEY - REDSHIFT DATA [J].
FISHER, KB ;
HUCHRA, JP ;
STRAUSS, MA ;
DAVIS, M ;
YAHIL, A ;
SCHLEGEL, D .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL SUPPLEMENT SERIES, 1995, 100 (01) :69-103
[9]  
GIBSON BK, 1999, IN PRESS APJ
[10]   Optical mass estimates of galaxy clusters [J].
Girardi, M ;
Giuricin, G ;
Mardirossian, F ;
Mezzetti, M ;
Boschin, W .
ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL, 1998, 505 (01) :74-95