Use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing to prevent vascular and epidural catheter colonization and infection: a meta-analysis

被引:110
作者
Ho, Kwok M. [1 ]
Litton, Edward [1 ]
机构
[1] Royal Perth Hosp, Intens Care Unit, Perth, WA 6000, Australia
关键词
infection control; antiseptics; disinfecting agents;
D O I
10.1093/jac/dkl234
中图分类号
R51 [传染病];
学科分类号
100401 ;
摘要
Objectives: Vascular and epidural catheter-related infections cause significant morbidities and mortality in hospitalized patients. This meta-analysis assessed the effect of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing on the risk of vascular and epidural catheter bacterial colonization and infection. Methods: Literature search was based on MEDLINE (1966 to 1 November 2005), EMBASE and Cochrane Controlled Trials Register (2005 issue 3) databases. Only randomized controlled clinical trials comparing chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing with placebo or povidine-iodine dressing were included in this meta-analysis. Two reviewers reviewed and extracted the data independently. Results: Eight studies assessing a single type of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing were identified and subjected to meta-analysis. The chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing reduced the risk of epidural [3.6% versus 35%, odds ratio (OR) 0.07, 95% Cl: 0.02-0.31, P = 0.0005] and intravascular catheter or exit-site bacterial colonization (14.8% versus 26.9%, OR 0.47,95% Cl: 0.34-0.65, P < 0.00001) (overall 14.3% versus 27.2%, OR 0.40, 95% Cl: 0.26-0.61; P < 0.0001). The use of chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing was associated with a trend towards reduction in catheter-related bloodstream or CNS infections (2.2% versus 3.8%, OR 0.58, 95% Cl: 0.29-1.14, P = 0.11). Local cutaneous reactions to chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing were reported in 5.6% of the patients in three studies (OR 8.17, 95% Cl: 1.19-56.14, P = 0.04), and 96% of these reactions occurred in neonatal patients. The number needed to prevent one episode of intravascular catheter-related bloodstream infection was 142 for an average period of catheter in situ of 10 days and a change of dressing every 5 days. The cost of preventing one vascular catheter-related bloodstream infection was estimated to be 298 pound (US$532.5). Conclusions: Chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing is effective in reducing vascular and epidural catheter bacterial colonization and is also associated with a trend towards reduction in catheter-related bloodstream or CNS infections. A large randomized controlled trial is needed to confirm whether chlorhexidine-impregnated dressing is cost-effective in preventing bacterial infection related to vascular and epidural catheters.
引用
收藏
页码:281 / 287
页数:7
相关论文
共 29 条
[1]   Statistics Notes - Interaction revisited: the difference between two estimates [J].
Altman, DG ;
Bland, JM .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 326 (7382) :219-219
[2]   In vitro assessment of chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated polyurethane foam antimicrobial dressing using zone of inhibition assays [J].
Bhende, S ;
Spangler, D .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (08) :664-667
[3]   Chlorhexidine compared with povidone-iodine solution for vascular catheter-site care: A meta-analysis [J].
Chaiyakunapruk, N ;
Veenstra, DL ;
Lipsky, BA ;
Saint, S .
ANNALS OF INTERNAL MEDICINE, 2002, 136 (11) :792-801
[4]   Reduction of exit-site infections of tunnelled intravascular catheters among neutropenic patients by sustained-release chlorhexidine dressings: results from a prospective randomized controlled trial [J].
Chambers, ST ;
Sanders, J ;
Patton, WN ;
Ganly, P ;
Birch, M ;
Crump, JA ;
Spearing, RL .
JOURNAL OF HOSPITAL INFECTION, 2005, 61 (01) :53-61
[5]   Cost-benefit analysis of chlorhexidine gluconate dressing in the prevention of catheter related bloodstream infections [J].
Crawford, AG ;
Fuhr, JP ;
Rao, B .
INFECTION CONTROL AND HOSPITAL EPIDEMIOLOGY, 2004, 25 (08) :668-674
[6]   The promise of novel technology for the prevention of intravascular device-related bloodstream infection. I. Pathogenesis and short-term devices [J].
Crnich, CJ ;
Maki, DG .
CLINICAL INFECTIOUS DISEASES, 2002, 34 (09) :1232-1242
[7]   A randomized trial comparing povidone-iodine to a chlorhexidine gluconate-impregnated dressing for prevention of central venous catheter infections in neonates [J].
Garland, JS ;
Alex, CP ;
Mueller, CD ;
Otten, D ;
Shivpuri, C ;
Harris, MC ;
Naples, M ;
Pellegrini, J ;
Buck, RK ;
McAuliffe, TL ;
Goldmann, DA ;
Maki, DG .
PEDIATRICS, 2001, 107 (06) :1431-1437
[8]   Central venous catheter dressings: a systematic review [J].
Gillies, D ;
O'Riordan, E ;
Carr, D ;
O'Brien, I ;
Frost, J ;
Gunning, R .
JOURNAL OF ADVANCED NURSING, 2003, 44 (06) :623-632
[9]  
Hanazaki K, 1999, J HOSP INFECT, V42, P165
[10]   Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses [J].
Higgins, JPT ;
Thompson, SG ;
Deeks, JJ ;
Altman, DG .
BMJ-BRITISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 2003, 327 (7414) :557-560