Robust estimation of hydrological model parameters

被引:137
作者
Bardossy, A. [1 ]
Singh, S. K. [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Stuttgart, Inst Hydraul Engn, D-70569 Stuttgart, Germany
关键词
D O I
10.5194/hess-12-1273-2008
中图分类号
P [天文学、地球科学];
学科分类号
07 ;
摘要
The estimation of hydrological model parameters is a challenging task. With increasing capacity of computational power several complex optimization algorithms have emerged, but none of the algorithms gives a unique and very best parameter vector. The parameters of fitted hydrological models depend upon the input data. The quality of input data cannot be assured as there may be measurement errors for both input and state variables. In this study a methodology has been developed to find a set of robust parameter vectors for a hydrological model. To see the effect of observational error on parameters, stochastically generated synthetic measurement errors were applied to observed discharge and temperature data. With this modified data, the model was calibrated and the effect of measurement errors on parameters was analysed. It was found that the measurement errors have a significant effect on the best performing parameter vector. The erroneous data led to very different optimal parameter vectors. To overcome this problem and to find a set of robust parameter vectors, a geometrical approach based on Tukey's half space depth was used. The depth of the set of N randomly generated parameters was calculated with respect to the set with the best model performance (Nash-Sutclife efficiency was used for this study) for each parameter vector. Based on the depth of parameter vectors, one can find a set of robust parameter vectors. The results show that the parameters chosen according to the above criteria have low sensitivity and perform well when transfered to a different time period. The method is demonstrated on the upper Neckar catchment in Germany. The conceptual HBV model was used for this study.
引用
收藏
页码:1273 / 1283
页数:11
相关论文
共 30 条
[1]   COMPARISON OF GEOSTATISTICAL METHODS FOR ESTIMATING TRANSMISSIVITY USING DATA ON TRANSMISSIVITY AND SPECIFIC CAPACITY [J].
AHMED, S ;
DEMARSILY, G .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 1987, 23 (09) :1717-1737
[2]   Impact of imperfect rainfall knowledge on the efficiency and the parameters of watershed models [J].
Andréassian, V ;
Perrin, C ;
Michel, C ;
Usart-Sanchez, I ;
Lavabre, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 250 (1-4) :206-223
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2004, Hacettepe Journal of Mathematics and Statistics
[4]   Modeling data relationships with a local variance reducing technique: Applications in hydrology [J].
Bardossy, A ;
Pegram, GGS ;
Samaniego, L .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2005, 41 (08) :1-13
[5]   Calibration of hydrological model parameters for ungauged catchments [J].
Bardossy, A. .
HYDROLOGY AND EARTH SYSTEM SCIENCES, 2007, 11 (02) :703-710
[6]  
Bergstrom S., 1995, COMPUTER MODELS WATE
[7]   THE FUTURE OF DISTRIBUTED MODELS - MODEL CALIBRATION AND UNCERTAINTY PREDICTION [J].
BEVEN, K ;
BINLEY, A .
HYDROLOGICAL PROCESSES, 1992, 6 (03) :279-298
[8]   Equifinality, data assimilation, and uncertainty estimation in mechanistic modelling of complex environmental systems using the GLUE methodology [J].
Beven, K ;
Freer, J .
JOURNAL OF HYDROLOGY, 2001, 249 (1-4) :11-29
[9]   Depth and homogeneity in regional flood frequency analysis [J].
Chebana, F. ;
Ouarda, T. B. M. J. .
WATER RESOURCES RESEARCH, 2008, 44 (11)
[10]   Monitoring multivariate aviation safety data by data depth: control charts and threshold systems [J].
Cheng, AY ;
Liu, RY ;
Luxhoj, JT .
IIE TRANSACTIONS, 2000, 32 (09) :861-872