Genetic variation in offspring condition: An experiment

被引:102
作者
Merila, J
机构
[1] Department of Zoology, Uppsala University, S-752 36 Uppsala
关键词
body condition; Ficedula albicollis; genetic variance; heritability;
D O I
10.2307/2389939
中图分类号
Q14 [生态学(生物生态学)];
学科分类号
071012 ; 0713 ;
摘要
1. Body condition, reflecting size of the subcutaneous fat reserves at the end of the nestling period, is a good predictor of subsequent survival in nestling passerines. While the condition has traditionally been viewed as a highly plastic trait reflecting the nutritional state of individuals determined by the quality of parental care, nothing is known about the genetics of this trait. 2. The heritability and underlying genetic, environmental and genotype-by-environment interaction components of variation in nestling body condition were estimated in the Collared Flycatcher, Ficedula albicollis. To distinguish between genetic and environmental causes of resemblance, a reciprocal split-brood design was applied where full-sibs were reared apart in two different experimentally created environments. 3. Nestlings reared in enlarged broods were in poorer condition than their full-sibs raised in reduced broods, indicating a large environmental component to phenotypic variation in body condition. 4. However, there was a significant additive genetic component to variation in body condition in all environments, but no evidence for genotype-environment interactions. As found earlier for life-history traits closely related with fitness, heritability estimates (in both experimental environments) were. generally low (h(2) approximate to 0.30) and sometimes not significantly different from zero. 5. These results suggest that environmental influences, e.g. amount and quality of received food, are major determinants of offspring condition. However, the small but significant additive genetic component suggests that there are also inherited differences in offspring viability and survival potential.
引用
收藏
页码:465 / 474
页数:10
相关论文
共 75 条
[1]  
*AB CONC INC, 1988, STATV SE GRAPH SOL D
[2]   GENETIC AND POSTHATCH PARENTAL INFLUENCES ON GROWTH IN PIGEON SQUABS [J].
AGGREY, SE ;
CHENG, KM .
JOURNAL OF HEREDITY, 1993, 84 (03) :184-187
[3]   PHENOTYPIC SELECTION ON HERITABLE SIZE TRAITS - ENVIRONMENTAL VARIANCE AND GENETIC RESPONSE [J].
ALATALO, RV ;
GUSTAFSSON, L ;
LUNDBERG, A .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1990, 135 (03) :464-471
[4]  
ALATALO RV, 1986, EVOLUTION, V40, P574, DOI 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1986.tb00508.x
[5]  
Alberts B., 1983, MOL BIOL CELL
[6]  
ANDERSON KV, 1989, GENES EMBRYOS, P1
[7]   EGG WEIGHT, SURVIVAL, AND GROWTH OF LESSER SNOW GOOSE GOSLINGS [J].
ANKNEY, CD .
JOURNAL OF WILDLIFE MANAGEMENT, 1980, 44 (01) :174-182
[8]  
[Anonymous], REPRODUCTIVE SUCCESS
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1981, Statistical Tables
[10]   ONTOGENY, TIMING OF DEVELOPMENT, AND GENETIC VARIANCE-COVARIANCE STRUCTURE [J].
ATCHLEY, WR .
AMERICAN NATURALIST, 1984, 123 (04) :519-540