Is probability weighting sensitive to the magnitude of consequences? An experimental investigation on losses

被引:85
作者
Etchart-Vincent, N [1 ]
机构
[1] GRID, Maison Rech ESTP, F-94230 Cachan, France
关键词
decision under risk; losses; cumulative prospect theory; probability weighting function;
D O I
10.1023/B:RISK.0000026096.48985.a3
中图分类号
F8 [财政、金融];
学科分类号
0202 ;
摘要
Experimental investigations of the probability weighting function over losses are scarce and all involve small payoffs. The paper aims to give new insight into the probability weighting function for losses, by eliciting it through a simple two-stage semi-parametric procedure over more realistic losses, and by investigating its sensitivity to the magnitude of the payoffs. Current data confirm previous evidence of convex utility functions and inverse-S-shaped weighting functions. Still, at least for small probabilities, probability weighting appears to be affected by the size of consequences: the larger the losses, the more aversive the gambles and the more pessimistic the subjects are.
引用
收藏
页码:217 / 235
页数:19
相关论文
共 48 条
[1]   Parameter-free elicitation of utility and probability weighting functions [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1497-1512
[2]   A genuine rank-dependent generalization of the von Neumann-Morgenstern expected utility theorem [J].
Abdellaoui, M .
ECONOMETRICA, 2002, 70 (02) :717-736
[3]  
ABDELLAOUI M, 2002, RECONCILING INTROSPE
[4]  
Allais M., 1988, RISK DECISION RATION
[5]   A parameter-free elicitation of the probability weighting function in medical decision analysis [J].
Bleichrodt, H ;
Pinto, JL .
MANAGEMENT SCIENCE, 2000, 46 (11) :1485-1496
[6]   THE EFFECT ON THE PREFERENCE-REVERSAL PHENOMENON OF USING CHOICE INDIFFERENCES [J].
BOSTIC, R ;
HERRNSTEIN, RJ ;
LUCE, RD .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC BEHAVIOR & ORGANIZATION, 1990, 13 (02) :193-212
[7]   The effects of financial incentives in experiments: A review and capital-labor-production framework [J].
Camerer, CF ;
Hogarth, RM .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1999, 19 (1-3) :7-42
[8]  
CAMERER CF, 1992, UTILITY THEORIES MEA
[9]   A COMPARISON OF THE ESTIMATES OF EXPECTED UTILITY AND NON-EXPECTED-UTILITY PREFERENCE FUNCTIONALS [J].
CARBONE, E ;
HEY, JD .
GENEVA PAPERS ON RISK AND INSURANCE THEORY, 1995, 20 (01) :111-133
[10]   DISCRIMINATING BETWEEN PREFERENCE FUNCTIONALS - A PRELIMINARY MONTE-CARLO STUDY [J].
CARBONE, E ;
HEY, JD .
JOURNAL OF RISK AND UNCERTAINTY, 1994, 8 (03) :223-242