Pregnancy after classic cesarean delivery

被引:69
作者
Chauhan, SP
Magann, EF
Wiggs, CD
Barrilleaux, PS
Martin, JN
机构
[1] Univ Mississippi, Med Ctr, Dept Obstet & Gynecol, Jackson, MS 39216 USA
[2] Spartanburg Reg Med Ctr, Spartanburg, SC USA
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0029-7844(02)02239-1
中图分类号
R71 [妇产科学];
学科分类号
100211 [妇产科学];
摘要
OBJECTIVE: To describe maternal and perinatal outcomes after a prior classic cesarean delivery. METHODS: A retrospective review was performed including all patients from 1990-2000 whose most recent pregnancy was preceded by classic cesarean delivery. RESULTS: During the 11-year period, there were 37,863 deliveries and 157 patients (0.4%) underwent classic cesarean operations. In the next pregnancy, one case of uterine rapture (0.6%, 95% confidence interval 0.1, 3.5) occurred at 29 weeks without preterm labor and resulted in fetal death. The prevalence of asymptomatic dehiscence was 9% (95% confidence interval 5, 15). There was no significant difference between patients with uterine dehiscence (n = 15) and patients with intact uteri (n = 141) with regard to maternal demographics, duration of labor, cervical dilatation at time of surgery, transfusion of packed red cells, bowel injury, postpartum endometritis, wound breakdown, thrombophlebitis, or umbilical arterial pH less than 7.00 (P >.05). Duration of labor, cervical dilatation, and gestational age at repeat cesarean delivery were poor predictors for uterine rupture or dehiscence. CONCLUSION: Among patients with prior classic cesarean delivery, uterine rupture and dehiscence are neither predictable nor preventable. One in four patients will experience some form of maternal morbidity. Uterine rupture, although infrequent, can be fatal to the fetus. Uterine dehiscence, however, does not increase neonatal or peripartum maternal morbidity. (C) 2002 by The American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists.
引用
收藏
页码:946 / 950
页数:5
相关论文
共 8 条
[1]
*AM COLL OBST GYN, 1999, ACOG PRACT B, V5
[2]
The relationship between gestational age and the incidence of classical Caesarean section [J].
Bethune, M ;
Permezel, M .
AUSTRALIAN & NEW ZEALAND JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS & GYNAECOLOGY, 1997, 37 (02) :153-155
[3]
A REVIEW OF CESAREAN SECTIONS AT 30 WEEKS GESTATION OR LESS IN THE WEST OF SCOTLAND 1988-1989 [J].
DODGSON, J ;
MACKENZIE, F ;
FORREST, CA .
SCOTTISH MEDICAL JOURNAL, 1992, 37 (02) :47-48
[4]
Douglas RG, 1969, CONTROVERSY OBSTET G, P308
[5]
CLASSICAL VERSUS LOW-SEGMENT TRANSVERSE INCISION FOR PRETERM CESAREAN-SECTION - MATERNAL COMPLICATIONS AND OUTCOME OF SUBSEQUENT PREGNANCIES [J].
HALPERIN, ME ;
MOORE, DC ;
HANNAH, WJ .
BRITISH JOURNAL OF OBSTETRICS AND GYNAECOLOGY, 1988, 95 (10) :990-996
[6]
UTERINE INCISION AND MATERNAL BLOOD-LOSS IN PRETERM CESAREAN-SECTION [J].
LAO, TT ;
HALPERN, SH ;
CROSBY, ET ;
HUH, C .
ARCHIVES OF GYNECOLOGY AND OBSTETRICS, 1993, 252 (03) :113-117
[7]
Quilligan EJ, 1982, DOUGLASSTROMME OPERA, P604
[8]
ROSEN MG, 1991, OBSTET GYNECOL, V77, P465