Putting People on the Map through an Approach That Integrates Social Data in Conservation Planning

被引:36
作者
Stephanson, Sheri L. [1 ]
Mascia, Michael B. [1 ]
机构
[1] World Wildlife Fund, Washington, DC 20037 USA
关键词
conservation planning; ecoregion conservation; political empowerment; social indicators; social well-being; GLOBAL BIODIVERSITY CONSERVATION; LAND-COVER; AREAS; OPPORTUNISM; DIMENSIONS; CHALLENGES; PRIORITIES; SCIENCE; THREATS; KEY;
D O I
10.1111/cobi.12357
中图分类号
X176 [生物多样性保护];
学科分类号
090705 ;
摘要
Conservation planning is integral to strategic and effective operations of conservation organizations. Drawing upon biological sciences, conservation planning has historically made limited use of social data. We offer an approach for integrating data on social well-being into conservation planning that captures and places into context the spatial patterns and trends in human needs and capacities. This hierarchical approach provides a nested framework for characterizing and mapping data on social well-being in 5 domains: economic well-being, health, political empowerment, education, and culture. These 5 domains each have multiple attributes; each attribute may be characterized by one or more indicators. Through existing or novel data that display spatial and temporal heterogeneity in social well-being, conservation scientists, planners, and decision makers may measure, benchmark, map, and integrate these data within conservation planning processes. Selecting indicators and integrating these data into conservation planning is an iterative, participatory process tailored to the local context and planning goals. Social well-being data complement biophysical and threat-oriented social data within conservation planning processes to inform decisions regarding where and how to conserve biodiversity, provide a structure for exploring socioecological relationships, and to foster adaptive management. Building upon existing conservation planning methods and insights from multiple disciplines, this approach to putting people on the map can readily merge with current planning practices to facilitate more rigorous decision making.
引用
收藏
页码:1236 / 1248
页数:13
相关论文
共 54 条
[1]   Biodiversity conservation and the eradication of poverty [J].
Adams, WM ;
Aveling, R ;
Brockington, D ;
Dickson, B ;
Elliott, J ;
Hutton, J ;
Roe, D ;
Vira, B ;
Wolmer, W .
SCIENCE, 2004, 306 (5699) :1146-1149
[2]  
[Anonymous], WORLD RES 2005 WEALT
[3]  
[Anonymous], 2013, Open Standards for the Practice of Conservation Version 3.0/April. The Conservation Measures Partnership
[4]  
[Anonymous], 2005, INV DEV PRACT PLAN A
[5]  
[Anonymous], 2005, Ecosystems and human well-being, V5, DOI DOI 10.1119/1.2344558
[6]  
[Anonymous], 2009, SPATIAL CONSERVATION
[7]  
[Anonymous], 2007, HUMAN DEV REPORT 200
[8]  
[Anonymous], MINUTES M COMMISSION
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1999, Sustainable Livelihood Guidance Sheets, DOI DOI 14097690/114438878/SUSTAINABLE1LIVELIHOODS1GUIDANCE1SHEETS.PDF/594-5EA6-99A9-2A4E-F288-CBB4AE4BEA8B?T51569512091877
[10]   Rethinking community-based conservation [J].
Berkes, F .
CONSERVATION BIOLOGY, 2004, 18 (03) :621-630