Mainstream economic methodology

被引:29
作者
Dow, SC
机构
关键词
D O I
10.1093/oxfordjournals.cje.a013660
中图分类号
F [经济];
学科分类号
02 ;
摘要
This is a survey of mainstream economic methodology, both in the sense of mainstream methodology and of mainstream economics. Tensions are identified in methodology resulting from an increasing preference for descriptivism over prescriptivism, and in economics resulting from an increasing preference for fragmentation over axiomatisation. The increasing attention of methodologists to the actual practice of economists, and of economists to possibilities outside the traditional axiomatic strictures, are both welcome. But, still being based in a dualistic mode of thought, these developments threaten to go too far, denying methodology any constructive role and removing any focus on the foundations for theorising. Non-mainstream methodology is shown to offer a non-dualistic solution which could resolve current tensions.
引用
收藏
页码:73 / 93
页数:21
相关论文
共 136 条
[1]  
AGASSI J, 1979, PHILOS SOC SCI, V9, P316, DOI 10.1177/004839317900900305
[2]  
Agassi J., 1965, CRITICAL APPROACH SC
[3]  
AMARIGLIO J, 1990, EC DISCOURSE
[4]  
AMARIGLIO JL, 1988, HIST POLITICAL EC, V20
[5]  
[Anonymous], PHILOS METHODOLOGY E
[6]  
[Anonymous], KEYNES PHILOS ESSAYS
[7]  
[Anonymous], EC METHODOLOGY BIBLI
[8]  
[Anonymous], NATURE EC THOUGHT ES
[9]  
[Anonymous], 1977, KNOWLEDGE IGNORANCE
[10]  
[Anonymous], 1989, MORE HEAT LIGHT