Evaluation of disability and handicap following injury

被引:28
作者
Currens, JAB [1 ]
机构
[1] St Bartholomews & Royal London Sch Med & Dent, Acad Unit Accident & Emergency, London, England
来源
INJURY-INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF THE CARE OF THE INJURED | 2000年 / 31卷 / 02期
关键词
D O I
10.1016/S0020-1383(99)00246-6
中图分类号
R4 [临床医学];
学科分类号
1002 ; 100602 ;
摘要
Disability and handicap outcome measures are fundamental components of trauma system evaluation. These outcomes are described for survivors of major trauma, attended by the HEMS, London system. Together with measures of injury severity, three functional instruments (Functional Independence Measure (FIM), Glasgow Outcome Scale (COS) and return to pre-injury work status (RTW)) were used to measure outcome in 201 trauma patients. By 12 months post injury 84.1% of cases were independent in Motor FIM, 88.1% in Cognitive FIM, 79.1% had good outcomes in GOS (grades 4 and 5) and 69.2% had returned to work. The functional measures showed a statistically significant relationship with minor and major and trauma (ISS < 16 and greater than or equal to 16): FIM (motor p < 0.002, cognitive p < 0.0003), GOS (p < 0.002) and RTW (p < 0.002). Division according to severity of principal injury confirmed the greatest disability and handicap resulted from the severest injuries (AIS 4-5): 68.9% achieved independence in Motor FIM, 73% in Cognitive FIM and only 40% returned to work. When grouped according to body region of principal injury, neurological injury, particularly severe injury (AIS 4-5) to head and spinal cord regions showed the poorest outcomes. FIM, GOS and RTW are recommended as standard indicators of disability and handicap for trauma registries and outcome studies. (C) 2000 Elsevier Science Ltd. All rights reserved.
引用
收藏
页码:99 / 106
页数:8
相关论文
共 32 条
[1]  
*AM ASS AUT MED, 1994, INJ IMP SCAL
[2]   Long-term prevalence of impairments and disabilities after multiple trauma [J].
Anke, AGW ;
Stanghelle, JK ;
Finset, A ;
Roaldsen, KS ;
PillgramLarsen, J ;
FuglMeyer, AR .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 42 (01) :54-61
[3]  
[Anonymous], 1980, International classification of impairments, disabilities and handicaps
[4]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE - METHOD FOR DESCRIBING PATIENTS WITH MULTIPLE INJURIES AND EVALUATING EMERGENCY CARE [J].
BAKER, SP ;
ONEILL, B ;
HADDON, W ;
LONG, WB .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1974, 14 (03) :187-196
[5]  
BLAND M, 1995, INTRO MED STAT, P146
[6]   EVALUATING TRAUMA CARE - THE TRISS METHOD [J].
BOYD, CR ;
TOLSON, MA ;
COPES, WS .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1987, 27 (04) :370-378
[7]   Long-term outcomes in blunt trauma: Who goes back to work? [J].
Brenneman, FD ;
Redelmeier, DA ;
Boulanger, BR ;
McLellan, BA ;
Culhane, JP .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1997, 42 (05) :778-781
[8]   INJURY SEVERITY SCORE OF ROAD TRAFFIC CASUALTIES IN RELATION TO MORTALITY, TIME OF DEATH, HOSPITAL TREATMENT TIME AND DISABILITY [J].
BULL, JP .
ACCIDENT ANALYSIS AND PREVENTION, 1975, 7 (04) :249-255
[9]   THE MAJOR TRAUMA OUTCOME STUDY - ESTABLISHING NATIONAL NORMS FOR TRAUMA CARE [J].
CHAMPION, HR ;
COPES, WS ;
SACCO, WJ ;
LAWNICK, MM ;
KEAST, SL ;
BAIN, LW ;
FLANAGAN, ME ;
FREY, CF .
JOURNAL OF TRAUMA-INJURY INFECTION AND CRITICAL CARE, 1990, 30 (11) :1356-1365
[10]  
EARLAM R, 1989, ANN R COLL SURG ENG, V71, P560