Is it talking, thinking, or both? A lagged dependent variable model of discussion effects on political knowledge

被引：122

作者：

Eveland, William P., Jr. ^{[1
]}

Thomson, Tiffany ^{[1
]}

机构：

[1] Ohio State Univ, Sch Commun, Columbus, OH 43210 USA

来源：

JOURNAL OF COMMUNICATION | 2006年 / 56卷 / 03期

关键词：

D O I：

10.1111/j.1460-2466.2006.00299.x

中图分类号：

G2 [信息与知识传播];

学科分类号：

05 ; 0503 ;

摘要：

This study extends existing research on political discussion's influence on political knowledge in two ways. First, it expands the measures of discussion-related cognition to include discussion elaboration and perspective taking. Second, it employs panel data, which permit stronger causal inferences than cross-sectional studies. Our findings indicate that, even controlling for prior knowledge, interest, news use, and news elaboration, political discussion frequency and discussion elaboration are positively related to political knowledge. However, perspective taking is unrelated to political knowledge.

引用

页码：523 / 542

页数：20

共 44 条

[1]

[Anonymous], 1995, SAGE U PAPER SERIES

[2] Testing the cognitive mediation model - The roles of news reliance and three gratifications sought [J].

Beaudoin, CE ;

Thorson, E .

COMMUNICATION RESEARCH, 2004, 31 (04) :446-471

[3]

BEAUDOIN CE, 2004, GAZETTE, V66, P459, DOI DOI 10.1177/0016549204045922

[4] Political talk over here, over there, over time [J].

Bennett, SE ;

Flickinger, RS ;

Rhine, SL .

BRITISH JOURNAL OF POLITICAL SCIENCE, 2000, 30 :99-119

[5]

BENNETT SE, 1994, POLITICAL BEHAVIOR, V16, P1

[6]

Campbell D.T., 1963, EXPT QUASIEXPERIMENT

[7]

CHAFFEE SH, 1986, HUMAN COMMUNICATION, V21, P305

[8]

Cooley C., 1902, Human nature and the social Order

[9] Effect of perspective taking on the cognitive representation of persons: A merging of self and other [J].

Davis, MH ;

Conklin, L ;

Smith, A ;

Luce, C .

JOURNAL OF PERSONALITY AND SOCIAL PSYCHOLOGY, 1996, 70 (04) :713-726

[10] Participation in conversations about the news [J].

de Boer, C ;

Velthuijsen, AS .

INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF PUBLIC OPINION RESEARCH, 2001, 13 (02) :140-158

← 1 2 3 4 5 →