Cost of screening for cancerous and precancerous lesions of the cervix

被引:14
作者
Méréa, E [1 ]
Le Galès, C [1 ]
Cochand-Priollet, B [1 ]
Cartier, I [1 ]
de Crémoux, P [1 ]
Vacher-Lavenu, MC [1 ]
Vielh, P [1 ]
Coste, J [1 ]
机构
[1] INSERM, U537, Ctr Hlth Econ & Adm, F-94276 Le Kremlin Bicetre, France
关键词
conventional smear test; thin-layer smear test; viral typing; evaluation; cost;
D O I
10.1002/dc.10177
中图分类号
R446 [实验室诊断]; R-33 [实验医学、医学实验];
学科分类号
1001 ;
摘要
This paper is part of the cost-effectiveness study of cervical cancer screening conducted by the French Society of Clinical Cytology (SFCC). It describes the evaluation of costs of conventional smear tests, thin-layer smear tests (ThinPrep 2000 system), and viral typing by the HCS(R) test. For 100,000 examinations per year, the average cost of a conventional smear test is $11.53 in a private anatomo-pathology clinic. The cost of the thin-layer test for the same number of examinations and in the same type of clinic is $13.93. For 20,000 annual tests, the average cost of human papillomavirus (HPV) is $23.43 in the public sector and $23.48 in the private one. The higher price of the thin-layer method is only justifiable if this screening technique outperforms the conventional method. Furthermore, the high cost of the HPV test means that its integration into a population-based screening program must be carefully defined. (C) 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
引用
收藏
页码:251 / 257
页数:7
相关论文
共 14 条
[1]   Cost-effectiveness of 3 methods to enhance the sensitivity of Papanicolaou testing [J].
Brown, AD ;
Garber, AM .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1999, 281 (04) :347-353
[2]   Cost-effectiveness of monolayers and human papillomavirus testing compared to that of conventional Papanicolaou smears for cervical cancer screening:: Protocol of the study of the French Society of Clinical Cytology [J].
Cochand-Priollet, B ;
Le Galès, C ;
de Cremoux, P ;
Molinié, V ;
Sastre-Garau, X ;
Vacher-Lavenu, MC ;
Vielh, P ;
Coste, J .
DIAGNOSTIC CYTOPATHOLOGY, 2001, 24 (06) :412-420
[3]  
CUZICK J, 1999, HLTH TECHNOL ASSESS, P3
[4]  
Drummond M., 2015, METHODS EC EVALUATIO, V4
[5]  
FAHEY MT, 1995, AM J EPIDEMIOL, V175, P466
[6]  
Ferenczy A, 1996, ACTA CYTOL, V40, P1136
[7]   Impact of automated technology on the cervical cytologic smear - A comparison of cost [J].
Grohs, DH .
ACTA CYTOLOGICA, 1998, 42 (01) :165-170
[8]  
Hutchinson ML, 1996, ACTA CYTOL, V40, P4
[9]   PAPNET-assisted rescreening of cervical smears - Cost and accuracy compared with a 100% manual rescreening strategy [J].
O'Leary, TJ ;
Tellado, M ;
Buckner, SB ;
Ali, IS ;
Stevens, A ;
Ollayos, CW .
JAMA-JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN MEDICAL ASSOCIATION, 1998, 279 (03) :235-237
[10]  
PAYNE N, 2000, HLTH TECHNOLOGY ASSE, P4