Effect of framing on adolescents' decision making

被引:13
作者
Chien, YC [1 ]
Lin, C [1 ]
Worthley, J [1 ]
机构
[1] UPLAND HIGH SCH,UPLAND,CA
关键词
D O I
10.2466/pms.1996.83.3.811
中图分类号
B84 [心理学];
学科分类号
04 ; 0402 ;
摘要
92 young adolescents were tested using Tversky and Kahneman's (1981) decision problems for framing effects. A notable number of young adolescents tested were not influenced by the context of the decision problems, thus they selected the same response option for positively and negatively framed problems. Parallel information was not available in Tversky and Kahneman's study for adults because they used a between-subjects design. However, for present adolescents who selected different response options for different framing problems, the response pattern exhibited by them resembled the general pattern exhibited by the adults tested in Tversky and Kahneman's study-negative frames led them to accept risk to avoid certain loss; positive frames prevented them from risking what they were certain to gain. Boys and girls were similar in their susceptibility to framing effects as were honors students in mathematics as compared to nonhonors students. Although the positive vs negative framing only influenced some of the young adolescents tested in this study, because the influence was consistent, researchers and educators interested in adolescents' decisions involving risky choices might use framing principles to design and assess cognitive interventions for high-risk behaviors among young adolescents.
引用
收藏
页码:811 / 819
页数:9
相关论文
共 23 条
[1]  
[Anonymous], AM PSYCHOL
[2]  
EAGLEY NS, 1990, PERSONALITY SOCIAL P, V16, P496
[3]   SUBJECTIVE FRAMING AND ATTITUDES TOWARDS RISK [J].
ELLIOTT, CS ;
ARCHIBALD, RB .
JOURNAL OF ECONOMIC PSYCHOLOGY, 1989, 10 (03) :321-328
[4]   THE EFFECTS OF DECISION FRAMING ON CHOICE OF RISKY VS CERTAIN OPTIONS [J].
FAGLEY, NS ;
MILLER, PM .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 39 (02) :264-277
[5]  
FURSTENBERG EF, 1985, APPL SOCIAL SCI CLIN
[6]   DECISION BIAS AND PERSONNEL-SELECTION STRATEGIES [J].
HUBER, VL ;
NEALE, MA ;
NORTHCRAFT, GB .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 40 (01) :136-147
[7]   JUDGMENT BY HEURISTICS - EFFECTS OF RATEE AND RATER CHARACTERISTICS AND PERFORMANCE STANDARDS ON PERFORMANCE-RELATED JUDGMENTS [J].
HUBER, VL ;
NEALE, MA ;
NORTHCRAFT, GB .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1987, 40 (02) :149-169
[8]   EFFECTS OF FRAMING ON AUDITOR DECISIONS [J].
JOHNSON, PE ;
JAMAL, K ;
BERRYMAN, RG .
ORGANIZATIONAL BEHAVIOR AND HUMAN DECISION PROCESSES, 1991, 50 (01) :75-105
[9]   MAKING JUDGMENTS WHEN INFORMATION IS MISSING - INFERENCES, BIASES, AND FRAMING EFFECTS [J].
JOHNSON, RD .
ACTA PSYCHOLOGICA, 1987, 66 (01) :69-82
[10]   CHOICES, VALUES, AND FRAMES [J].
KAHNEMAN, D ;
TVERSKY, A .
AMERICAN PSYCHOLOGIST, 1984, 39 (04) :341-350