Integrated neural processes for defining potential actions and deciding between them: A computational model

被引:239
作者
Cisek, Paul [1 ]
机构
[1] Univ Montreal, Dept Physiol, Montreal, PQ H3C 3J7, Canada
关键词
decision making; planning; cognition; cerebral cortex; computational model; neural coding;
D O I
10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5605-05.2006
中图分类号
Q189 [神经科学];
学科分类号
071006 ;
摘要
To successfully accomplish a behavioral goal such as reaching for an object, an animal must solve two related problems: to decide which object to reach and to plan the specific parameters of the movement. Traditionally, these two problems have been viewed as separate, and theories of decision making and motor planning have been developed primarily independently. However, neural data suggests that these processes involve the same brain regions and are performed in an integrated manner. Here, a computational model is described that addresses both the question of how different potential actions are specified and how the brain decides between them. In the model, multiple potential actions are simultaneously represented as continuous regions of activity within populations of cells in frontoparietal cortex. These representations engage in a competition for overt execution that is biased by modulatory influences from prefrontal cortex. The model neural populations exhibit activity patterns that correlate with both the spatial metrics of potential actions and their associated decision variables, in a manner similar to activities in parietal, prefrontal, and premotor cortex. The model therefore suggests an explanation for neural data that have been hard to account for in terms of serial theories that propose that decision making occurs before action planning. In addition to simulating the activity of individual neurons during decision tasks, the model also reproduces key aspects of the spatial and temporal statistics of human choices and makes a number of testable predictions.
引用
收藏
页码:9761 / 9770
页数:10
相关论文
共 68 条
[1]  
Basso MA, 1998, J NEUROSCI, V18, P7519
[2]   Computational nature of human adaptive control during learning of reaching movements in force fields [J].
Bhushan, N ;
Shadmehr, R .
BIOLOGICAL CYBERNETICS, 1999, 81 (01) :39-60
[3]   The mechanisms of movement preparation: a precuing study [J].
Bock, O ;
Eversheim, U .
BEHAVIOURAL BRAIN RESEARCH, 2000, 108 (01) :85-90
[4]   Attention and visual perception [J].
Boynton, GM .
CURRENT OPINION IN NEUROBIOLOGY, 2005, 15 (04) :465-469
[5]   Manipulating intent: Evidence for a causal role of the superior colliculus in target selection [J].
Carello, CD ;
Krauzlis, RJ .
NEURON, 2004, 43 (04) :575-583
[6]   NEURAL COMPUTATION OF LOG LIKELIHOOD IN CONTROL OF SACCADIC EYE-MOVEMENTS [J].
CARPENTER, RHS ;
WILLIAMS, MLL .
NATURE, 1995, 377 (6544) :59-62
[7]   Common codes for situated interaction [J].
Cisek, P ;
Kalaska, JF .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2001, 24 (05) :883-+
[8]   Embodiment is all in the head [J].
Cisek, P .
BEHAVIORAL AND BRAIN SCIENCES, 2001, 24 (01) :36-+
[9]   A cortico-spinal model of reaching and proprioception under multiple task constraints [J].
Cisek, P ;
Grossberg, S ;
Bullock, D .
JOURNAL OF COGNITIVE NEUROSCIENCE, 1998, 10 (04) :425-444
[10]   Neural correlates of reaching decisions in dorsal premotor cortex: Specification of multiple direction choices and final selection of action [J].
Cisek, P ;
Kalaska, JF .
NEURON, 2005, 45 (05) :801-814