A prospective analysis of staging laparoscopy in patients with primary and secondary hepatobiliary malignancies

被引:83
作者
Jarnagin, WR [1 ]
Bodniewicz, J [1 ]
Dougherty, E [1 ]
Conlon, K [1 ]
Blumgart, LH [1 ]
Fong, Y [1 ]
机构
[1] Mem Sloan Kettering Canc Ctr, Dept Surg, New York, NY 10021 USA
关键词
staging laparoscopys; hepatobiliary malignancies;
D O I
10.1016/S1091-255X(00)80030-X
中图分类号
R57 [消化系及腹部疾病];
学科分类号
摘要
Laparoscopy and laparoscopic ultrasound are used widely in cancer staging and are perceived to prevent unnecessary open exploration in many patients. The aim of this study was to analyze the impact of staging laparoscopy in improving resectability in patients with primary and secondary hepatobiliary malignancies. Over a 10-month period (November 1, 1997 to August 31, 1998), 186 patients with primary and secondary hepatobiliary cancers were submitted to operation for potentially curative resection. One hundred four patients staged laparoscopically (LAP) before laparotomy were compared prospectively to 82 patients undergoing exploration without laparoscopy (NO LAP). Assignment to each group was not random but was based on surgeon practice. Demographic data, diagnoses, the extent of preoperative evaluation, and the percentage of patients resected were similar in the two groups. Laparoscopy identified 26 (67%) of 39 patients with unresectable disease. In the NO LAP group, 28 patients (34%) had unresectable disease discovered at laparotomy In patients with unresectable disease and submitted to biopsy only, the operating times were similar in the two groups (LAP 83 +/- 22 minutes vs, NO LAP 91 +/- 33 minutes; P = 0.4). However, laparoscopic staging significantly reduced the length of hospital stay (LAP 2.2 +/- 2 days vs. SO LAP 8.5 +/- 8.6 days; P = 0.006). Likewise, total hospital charges, normalized to 100 in the NO LAP patients, were significantly longer in the LAP group (LAP 54 +/- 42 vs. NO LAP 100 +/- 84; P = 0.02). Staging laparoscopy identified the majority of patients with unresectable hepatobiliary malignancies, significantly improved resectability and reduced the number of days in the hospital and the total charges. The yield of laparoscopy was greatest for detecting peritoneal metastases (9 of 10), additional hepatic turners (10 of 12), and unsuspected advanced cirrhosis (5 of 5) but often failed to identify; nonresectability because of lymph node metastases, vascular involvement, or extensive biliary involvement. Eighty-three percent of patients subjected to laparotomy after laparoscopy underwent a potentially curative resection compared to 66% of those who were not staged laparoscopically.
引用
收藏
页码:34 / 42
页数:9
相关论文
共 19 条
[1]   ROLE OF STAGING LAPAROSCOPY IN THE TREATMENT OF HEPATIC MALIGNANCY [J].
BABINEAU, TJ ;
LEWIS, WD ;
JENKINS, RL ;
BLEDAY, R ;
STEELE, GD ;
FORSE, RA .
AMERICAN JOURNAL OF SURGERY, 1994, 167 (01) :151-155
[2]   Long-term results after resection for gallbladder cancer - Implications for staging and management [J].
Bartlett, DL ;
Fong, YM ;
Fortner, JG ;
Brennan, MF ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1996, 224 (05) :639-646
[3]  
BLUMGART LH, 1994, SURG LIVER BILIARY T, P967
[4]  
Burke EC, 1998, ANN SURG, V228, P385, DOI 10.1097/00000658-199809000-00011
[5]   Staging laparoscopy with laparoscopic ultrasonography: Optimizing resectability in hepatobiliary and pancreatic malignancy [J].
Callery, MP ;
Strasberg, SM ;
Doherty, GM ;
Soper, NJ ;
Norton, JA .
JOURNAL OF THE AMERICAN COLLEGE OF SURGEONS, 1997, 185 (01) :33-39
[6]  
CONLON K, IN PRESS ANN SURG ON
[7]  
DAngelica M, 1997, J AM COLL SURGEONS, V185, P554
[8]   An analysis of 412 cases of hepatocellular carcinoma at a western center [J].
Fong, YM ;
Sun, RL ;
Jarnagin, W ;
Blumgart, LH .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1999, 229 (06) :790-799
[9]   MULTIVARIATE-ANALYSIS OF A PERSONAL SERIES OF 247 CONSECUTIVE PATIENTS WITH LIVER METASTASES FROM COLORECTAL-CANCER .1. TREATMENT BY HEPATIC RESECTION [J].
FORTNER, JG ;
SILVA, JS ;
GOLBEY, RB ;
COX, EB ;
MACLEAN, BJ .
ANNALS OF SURGERY, 1984, 199 (03) :306-316
[10]  
Gibbs JF, 1998, CANCER-AM CANCER SOC, V82, P1244, DOI 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0142(19980401)82:7<1244::AID-CNCR6>3.0.CO